2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2012.10.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Qualitative identification of cracks using 3D transient elastodynamic topological derivative: Formulation and FE implementation

Abstract: To cite this version:Cédric Bellis, Marc Bonnet. Abstract A time-domain topological derivative (TD) approach is developed for transient elasticwave imaging of buried cracks. The TD, which quantifies the sensitivity of the misfit cost functional to the creation at a specified location of an infinitesimal trial crack, is expressed in terms of the time convolution of the free field and an adjoint field as a function of that specified location and of the trial crack shape. Following previous studies on cavity iden… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Owning to the linearity of the forward scattering problem with respect to the excitation, (31) and (32) …”
Section: Scattered Pressure Field Due To Vanishing Solid Obstaclementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Owning to the linearity of the forward scattering problem with respect to the excitation, (31) and (32) …”
Section: Scattered Pressure Field Due To Vanishing Solid Obstaclementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of topological sensitivity (TS), since its inception in the context of structural shape optimization, [9,10] has been generalized and applied to deal with inverse scattering problems in acoustics, [7,[11][12][13][14][15][16][17] electromagnetism, [18][19][20][21][22][23] and elastodynamics. [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33] In the reconstruction approach, the TS indicator function is defined as the sensitivity of a given cost functional (that would commonly be used as a platform for non-linear minimization) with respect to the nucleation of an infinitesimal obstacle at a prescribed sampling point in the reference (background) medium. Accordingly, the support of hidden obstacles is exposed through the spatial distribution of topological sensitivity, namely the regions where TS attains pronounced negative values.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where Φ ∞ L is the far-field pattern of a test radiating field, generated by a small trial fracture L ⊂ R 3 with prescribed FOD a ∈H 1/2 (L) 3 (see [47] for details). Without loss of generality, L can be taken as a vanishing penny-shaped fracture at z ∈ R 3 with normal n ∈ Ω and constant (mode I) FOD profile a ∝ n, in which case (8) yields…”
Section: Geometric Fracture Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where Γ trial contains the origin, the topological sensitivity (TS) of the featured cost functional can be defined as the leading-order term in the expansion of J(Γ ε ) with respect to the vanishing (trial) fracture size, ε → 0 [10]. In what follows, Γ trial is taken as a penny-shaped fracture of unit radius with unit normal n , shear specific stiffness κ t , and normal specific stiffness κ n .…”
Section: Topological Sensitivity For a Fracture With Specific Stiffnessmentioning
confidence: 99%