2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00256-020-03372-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Qualitative evaluation of MRI features of lipoma and atypical lipomatous tumor: results from a multicenter study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
23
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Deep and proximal lower limb lesions show inadequate fat suppression and architecture findings in ALT cases without the contrast enhancement. On the other hand, MRI with contrast enhancement changes the impression of diagnosis incorrectly changed from benign lipoma to ALT [30]. Therefore, these findings suggest to us the importance of the combination of investigation including physical examination and imaging for the diagnosis of ALT.…”
Section: Mrimentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Deep and proximal lower limb lesions show inadequate fat suppression and architecture findings in ALT cases without the contrast enhancement. On the other hand, MRI with contrast enhancement changes the impression of diagnosis incorrectly changed from benign lipoma to ALT [30]. Therefore, these findings suggest to us the importance of the combination of investigation including physical examination and imaging for the diagnosis of ALT.…”
Section: Mrimentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Several authors have suggested that enhancement is predictive of ALT (33,34) but a recent study (35) suggests similar accuracy of readers in lesion diagnosis with and without contrast studies. These authors went further to suggest that post contrast imaging did not significantly change confidence in diagnosis and in some cases led to changing of correct diagnoses prompting a conclusion that contrast enhancement in lipomatous lesions may be limited and occasionally misleading (35). Finally, a retrospective study design allows the evaluation of potential relationships between textual features and lesion characterisation, but can result in selection bias.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study used non-fat saturated T1W or PD MR images from 185 patients; 83 males, 102 females; age 58.4 ± 11.9 years (range: 23-89 years), who underwent musculoskeletal MRI as part of the pre-operative evaluation of their LTs at 4 participating institutions. Details on cohort identification are similar to the ones that have been previously described [26]. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at the host university, and several data transfer agreements were in effect between host university and other universities.…”
Section: Mr Images and Training Data Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%