2010
DOI: 10.22605/rrh1467
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Qualitative evaluation of a physical activity-based chronic disease prevention program in a low-income, rural South African setting

Abstract: Qualitative evaluation of a physical activity-based chronic disease prevention program in a low-income, rural SouthAfrican setting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(31 reference statements)
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Likewise, teachers’ previous implementation behavior (taught several sessions or some activities of FOYC in the past 12 months) predicted better performance in the following year. Teachers’ sense of community ownership for the intervention was positively related to the fidelity of program implementation before the optimization trial, which is consistent with prior research (Draper et al, 2010 ). Teachers’ comfort in teaching FOYC and CImPACT and leading roleplays were related to teachers’ fidelity of implementation, which is consistent with findings from previous studies reporting teacher self-efficacy and comfort as significant predictors of implementation (adherence) (LaChausse et al, 2014 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Likewise, teachers’ previous implementation behavior (taught several sessions or some activities of FOYC in the past 12 months) predicted better performance in the following year. Teachers’ sense of community ownership for the intervention was positively related to the fidelity of program implementation before the optimization trial, which is consistent with prior research (Draper et al, 2010 ). Teachers’ comfort in teaching FOYC and CImPACT and leading roleplays were related to teachers’ fidelity of implementation, which is consistent with findings from previous studies reporting teacher self-efficacy and comfort as significant predictors of implementation (adherence) (LaChausse et al, 2014 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Teachers ' Characteristics, Training Experience, and Perceptions. A preimplementation questionnaire was used to collect information on factors influencing fidelity of intervention implementation: teacher's level of education; years as a teacher; training in interactive teaching; teacher's attendance at FOYC training workshop; teacher's perceptions of the importance of HIV prevention (very meaningful, somewhat meaningful, or not at all meaningful) for grade 6 students; prior experience of teaching HIV intervention, teacher's comfort level in teaching the FOYC + CImPACT intervention, teacher's sense of "ownership" of the curriculum (i.e., perceiving it as a "Bahamian intervention") [Beets et al, 2008;Draper et al, 2010], and whether teachers had had other competing lessons or teaching priorities.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other important factors influencing teacher implementation fidelity include ease of integrating a program into the existing school curriculum (Dusenbury et al, 2003), principal support (Dusenbury et al, 2003; Wang, Deveaux, et al, 2015), teachers’ perception of the importance and relevance of the program (Draper et al, 2010; Wang, Deveaux, et al, 2015), teachers’ self-efficacy (Wang et al, 2022), and their confidence in and comfort level with the intervention, especially on sensitive topics of sex education (Rohrbach et al, 1993; Wang, Stanton, et al, 2015). Teachers’ perceptions about ownership of the intervention, student engagement and responsiveness, and positive impacts on students are key factors toward implementation fidelity (Draper et al, 2010; McIntosh et al, 2013; Mihalic et al, 2008).…”
Section: Implementation Strategies and Delivery Modalitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%