Qualitative evaluation of a delirium prevention and management programme

Kang, Yun; Moyle, Wendy; Cooke, Marie; O’Dwyer, Siobhan

doi:10.1111/jocn.13799

Cited by 9 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 43 publications

(50 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Four studies reported that CPD on the topic resulted in healthcare professionals feeling more confident and competent in identifying and managing delirium in the older person (Akinjogbin et al., 2020; Fick et al., 2018; Kang et al., 2017; Rosen et al., 2013). Healthcare professionals in fifteen studies requested more delirium training to include consequences of undiagnosed delirium, assessment tools, hypoactive delirium, delirium superimposed on dementia and other underlying cognitive impairments and care management (Akintade et al., 2011; Alhaidari & Allen‐Narker, 2017; Campioni‐Norman & Vizcaychipi, 2017; Emme, 2020; Hosie et al., 2015; Kai‐Chung Wong et al., 2018; Kang et al., 2017; LaMantia et al., 2017; Merkin et al., 2014; Randles et al., 2018; Rosen et al., 2013; Ryan & Milligan, 2017; Schonnop et al., 2022; Van de Steeg et al., 2014; Wang & Mentes, 2009). A lack of CPD on the topic meant that healthcare professionals found it difficult to administer and interpret delirium assessment tools (Alhaidari & Allen‐Narker, 2017; Hosie et al., 2015; Kai‐Chung Wong et al., 2018; Kang et al., 2017; Rice et al., 2011).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Healthcare professionals in fifteen studies requested more delirium training to include consequences of undiagnosed delirium, assessment tools, hypoactive delirium, delirium superimposed on dementia and other underlying cognitive impairments and care management (Akintade et al., 2011; Alhaidari & Allen‐Narker, 2017; Campioni‐Norman & Vizcaychipi, 2017; Emme, 2020; Hosie et al., 2015; Kai‐Chung Wong et al., 2018; Kang et al., 2017; LaMantia et al., 2017; Merkin et al., 2014; Randles et al., 2018; Rosen et al., 2013; Ryan & Milligan, 2017; Schonnop et al., 2022; Van de Steeg et al., 2014; Wang & Mentes, 2009). A lack of CPD on the topic meant that healthcare professionals found it difficult to administer and interpret delirium assessment tools (Alhaidari & Allen‐Narker, 2017; Hosie et al., 2015; Kai‐Chung Wong et al., 2018; Kang et al., 2017; Rice et al., 2011). For example, it was difficult to evaluate the CAM items ‘acute onset’, ‘inattention’, ‘disorientation’ and ‘altered consciousness’ (Kai‐Chung Wong et al., 2018; Rice et al., 2011).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Eighteen studies reported a lack of continuous professional development (CPD) on the topic of delirium. Four studies reported that CPD on the topic resulted in healthcare professionals feeling more confident and competent in identifying and managing delirium in the older person (Akinjogbin et al, 2020;Fick et al, 2018;Kang et al, 2017;Rosen et al, 2013) Wang & Mentes, 2009). A lack of CPD on the topic meant that healthcare professionals found it difficult to administer and interpret delirium assessment tools (Alhaidari & Allen-Narker, 2017;Hosie et al, 2015;Kai-Chung Wong et al, 2018;Kang et al, 2017;Rice et al, 2011).…”

Section: Workforce Developmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Four studies reported that CPD on the topic resulted in healthcare professionals feeling more confident and competent in identifying and managing delirium in the older person (Akinjogbin et al, 2020;Fick et al, 2018;Kang et al, 2017;Rosen et al, 2013) Wang & Mentes, 2009). A lack of CPD on the topic meant that healthcare professionals found it difficult to administer and interpret delirium assessment tools (Alhaidari & Allen-Narker, 2017;Hosie et al, 2015;Kai-Chung Wong et al, 2018;Kang et al, 2017;Rice et al, 2011). For example, it was difficult to evaluate the CAM items 'acute onset', 'inattention', 'disorientation' and 'altered consciousness' (Kai-Chung Wong et al, 2018;Rice et al, 2011).…”

Section: Workforce Developmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Barriers to healthcare professionals recognizing and managing delirium in older adults during a hospital stay: A mixed‐methods systematic review

Bianchi,

Harris,

Fitzpatrick

2023

Journal of Advanced Nursing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

AimTo investigate barriers to healthcare professionals recognizing and managing delirium in hospitalized older people.DesignA mixed‐methods systematic review. PROSPERO ID: CRD42020187932.Data SourcesMEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and CINAHL were searched (2007 to February 2023).Review MethodsIncluded studies focused on healthcare professionals' recognition and management of delirium for patients aged 65 years and over in a hospital ward or emergency department. Enhancing rigour, screening of results was conducted independently by two researchers. Qualitative and quantitative data were tabulated separately and grouped. Data were compared to identify similarities and differences. All studies were quality appraised.Results43 studies were included; 24 quantitative, 16 qualitative and three mixed‐methods. Data synthesis highlighted synergy between qualitative and quantitative findings. Barriers were reflected in six themes: (1) healthcare professionals' knowledge and understanding; (2) communication; (3) workforce development; (4) interprofessional working; (5) confounders; and (6) organizational constraints.ConclusionsOf significance, for older adults in hospital experiencing delirium, there is variability in whether and how well it is recognized and managed. To prevent adverse outcomes best practice guidance for screening, recognizing, diagnosing and managing delirium in older people needs to be agreed and disseminated widely. Supporting healthcare professionals to care for this patient population using an integrated approach is essential, how to involve and communicate with patients and their family and friends, how to recognize and manage delirium for patients with additional needs, e.g., those living with dementia and/or a learning disability. Hospitals need to have policy and guidance in place for the recognition and management of delirium in older adults presenting to a ward or to an emergency department. An IT infrastructure is needed that integrates assessments and care management plans in patient electronic records and makes them accessible within and across teams in hospital, primary and community care settings.Patient or Public ContributionThere was no patient or public contribution to this systematic review.Implications for the Profession and Patient CareHealthcare professionals can be better supported to be able to recognize and manage delirium during an acute hospital stay for older adults. This includes maximizing best care for those patients living with dementia, involving families and friends to help understand patients' baseline status and changes and supporting families and friends during this process. Of significance, attention to hospital IT infrastructures is warranted, integrating screening, assessment and care management plans in patients' electronic records and making these accessible to healthcare professionals caring for this patient population across care settings.ImpactWhat problem did the study address? Delirium is a common condition experienced by older hospitalized patients, but it is consistently under‐recognized which has implications for patient and organization outcomes. To help address this, understanding barriers to healthcare professionals recognizing and managing delirium for this patient population is paramount.What were the main findings? Barriers to healthcare professionals recognizing and managing delirium for this patient population were synthesized in six themes: (1) healthcare professionals' knowledge and understanding, (2) communication; (3) workforce development; (4) interprofessional working; (5) confounders; and (6) organizational constraints.Where and on whom will the research have an impact? The findings of this original systematic review can contribute to hospital policy and protocol for the recognition and management of delirium in older patients. The findings can meaningfully contribute to workforce professional development for practitioners caring for older people during an acute hospital stay and for practitioners in primary and community settings involved in the follow‐up of patients post hospital discharge.For researchers, the findings indicate several research recommendations including investigating the impact of an education programme for nurses and other healthcare professionals on the recognition and management of the condition and understanding and investigating how best to support delirium‐related distress experienced by patients and their families and practitioners.Reporting MethodThis systematic review was reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (Page et al., 2021).

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Workforce Developmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Four studies reported that CPD on the topic resulted in healthcare professionals feeling more confident and competent in identifying and managing delirium in the older person (Akinjogbin et al, 2020;Fick et al, 2018;Kang et al, 2017;Rosen et al, 2013) Wang & Mentes, 2009). A lack of CPD on the topic meant that healthcare professionals found it difficult to administer and interpret delirium assessment tools (Alhaidari & Allen-Narker, 2017;Hosie et al, 2015;Kai-Chung Wong et al, 2018;Kang et al, 2017;Rice et al, 2011). For example, it was difficult to evaluate the CAM items 'acute onset', 'inattention', 'disorientation' and 'altered consciousness' (Kai-Chung Wong et al, 2018;Rice et al, 2011).…”

Section: Workforce Developmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Barriers to healthcare professionals recognizing and managing delirium in older adults during a hospital stay: A mixed‐methods systematic review

Bianchi,

Harris,

Fitzpatrick

2023

Journal of Advanced Nursing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The healthcare team, including nurses should be cognisant of the general and population specific risk factors for delirium, the variations in presentation identified as delirium and the documentation and communication of the symptoms within the team, so that the appropriate treatment strategies and evidence‐based delirium prevention interventions could be implemented (see, e.g., McDonnell & Timmins, ). The current literature is, however, not just addressing limited awareness on delirium, its risk factors and symptoms, but also attributed lack of relevant formal and ongoing education among nurses and physicians (Kang, Moyle, Cooke, & O'Dwyer, ; McDonnell & Timmins, )…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Falls and delirium in an acute care setting: A retrospective chart review before and after an organisation‐wide interprofessional education

Babine

Hyrkäs

Hallen

et al. 2018

Journal of Clinical Nursing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Qualitative evaluation in nursing interventions—A review of the literature

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim To identify and synthesize qualitative evaluation methods used in nursing interventions. Design A systematic qualitative review with a content analysis. Four databases were used: MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Embase and CINAHL using pre‐defined terms. The included papers were published from 2014–2018. Methods We followed the guidelines of Dixon‐Woods et al., Sandelowski and Barroso, the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme qualitative checklist and The Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research Approach. Results Of 103 papers, 15 were eligible for inclusion. The main theme Challenging complexity by evaluating qualitatively described processes and characteristics of qualitative evaluation. Two analytic themes emerged: Evaluating the implementation process and Evaluating improvements brought about by the programme. Conclusion Different qualitative evaluation methods in nursing are a way of documenting knowledge that is difficult to illuminate in natural settings and make an important contribution when determining the pros and cons of an intervention.

show abstract

Qualitative evaluation of a delirium prevention and management programme

Abstract: Registered nurses in South Korea should need not only appropriate education, but also adequate resources, policies and guidelines as well as support from managers and from all other healthcare professionals.

Cited by 9 publications

References 43 publications

Barriers to healthcare professionals recognizing and managing delirium in older adults during a hospital stay: A mixed‐methods systematic review

Barriers to healthcare professionals recognizing and managing delirium in older adults during a hospital stay: A mixed‐methods systematic review

Falls and delirium in an acute care setting: A retrospective chart review before and after an organisation‐wide interprofessional education

Qualitative evaluation in nursing interventions—A review of the literature

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About