2010
DOI: 10.1243/09544097jrrt303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Qualitative Comparison of the Characteristics of Articulated and Non-Articulated Trains and Their Effects on Impact

Abstract: This article presents a qualitative comparison of the key characteristics and subsequent impact performance for articulated and non-articulated train types. The fundamental purpose of the article is through a review of articulated and non-articulated trains in terms of impact stability to identify and compare the areas referred to as 'impact worthiness' design.The major differences between articulated and non-articulated trains are highlighted first. Then, the mechanical reasons leading to the differences and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In terms of connective stability, articulated trains have an advantage over conventional non-articulated trains. 12…”
Section: Robustness Of Crashworthy Designs In Different Impact Scenariosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of connective stability, articulated trains have an advantage over conventional non-articulated trains. 12…”
Section: Robustness Of Crashworthy Designs In Different Impact Scenariosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La unión entre cajas proporciona ventajas desde el punto de vista de un posible descarrilo, al proveer al tren de un sistema antiacaballamiento de forma natural [121]. Además, el tren es menos sensible al viento lateral.…”
Section: Ventajas De La Configuración Articuladaunclassified