Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Systematic Comparative Methods

Abstract

During the past two decades, a set of systematic comparative case analysis techniques has been developing at a steady pace. During the last few years especially, the main initial technique, qualitative comparative analysis (QCA), has been complemented by other related methods and techniques. The purpose of this article is to critically assess some main recent developments in this field. QCA and connected methods can be considered at two levels: as a research strategy and as a set of concrete techniques. The author first argues that such a strategy displays some decisive advantages in social science research, especially in small-and intermediate- N research designs. Second, QCA as well as three other related techniques, namely multi-value QCA (MVQCA), fuzzy sets and MSDO/MDSO, are presented in brief, and some current debates with regard to these techniques are also summarized. In the third section, the article surveys recent contributions and ongoing efforts that have provided some advances in the application of these techniques, around five key issues: case selection and model specification; measurement, dichotomization and linkage with theory; contradictions and non-observed cases; the time and process dimension; and the confrontation or combination with other methods. Finally, the article discuss the potential for further development of these methods in social science research broadly defined.

Avoiding deforestation in Panamanian protected areas: An analysis of protection effectiveness and implications for reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation

“…QCA uses Boolean logic to maximize the number of permutations of conditions (to 2 [# of conditions] ) across a limited sample and infer conjoint causation between conditions and the outcome, that is, causation of a specific set of conditions acting collectively and interactively on the outcome. Causation is inferred not merely by the consistent presence of a condition relative to an outcome but also by its absence, across all possible permutations of conditions (Rihoux, 2006). Therefore, QCA validates the role of a condition through negative-case analysis, highlights interaction between conditions and recognizes 'absence' as a causative factor.…”

“…QCA is a small-sample analysis that uses cross-case comparisons to reduce causal complexity into a minimal set of conditions necessary for an outcome (Rihoux, 2006). QCA uses Boolean logic to maximize the number of permutations of conditions (to 2 [# of conditions] ) across a limited sample and infer conjoint causation between conditions and the outcome, that is, causation of a specific set of conditions acting collectively and interactively on the outcome.…”

Role of Virtual Education in Higher Education from the View of Existence Philosophy

“…Concerning the fact that there are various methods for qualitative content analysis (Given, 2008), the present study applies comparative analysis. As (Rihoux, 2006) believes, comparative analysis is a comparison between subjects, predicates, collections, individuals, groups or time periods which reveals the similarities and differences between them. The main part of constant comparative analysis is called "constant comparative analysis" and it is said that" ":"… It involves taking one entity or piece of data, such as a statement, an interview, or a theme and comparing it with others to identify similarities or differences.…”

Determinants of MNEs' Natural Resources Endowments on Performance: An Analytical Model

“…The research could initially take a case-oriented approach with empirical validation sought by using methods such as Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA). One of the primary advantages of using QCA is the ability to analyze data for small and intermediate size samples (Rihoux, 2006). Such research would develop a more detailed understanding of the proposed framework, which would spur hypothesis-testing work in the future.…”