2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.08.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Qualitative assessment of ‘highly digestible’ protein mutation in hard endosperm sorghum and its functional properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the key challenges associated with the use of sorghum as protein-rich food are low protein digestibility and poor protein quality (low lysine), which reduce its nutritional value especially for those who rely on sorghum as a staple food source. Breeding efforts to improve these were successful with hd (high digestible) proteins transferred into well-established sorghum hybrids resulting in improved protein digestibility by 25-40% ( Teferra et al., 2019 ). More recently, clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) gene-editing technique was used to develop sorghum variants with improved protein quality (increased lysine content) and digestibility ( Li et al., 2018 ) thus presenting a new opportunity for more rapid and precise sorghum improvement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the key challenges associated with the use of sorghum as protein-rich food are low protein digestibility and poor protein quality (low lysine), which reduce its nutritional value especially for those who rely on sorghum as a staple food source. Breeding efforts to improve these were successful with hd (high digestible) proteins transferred into well-established sorghum hybrids resulting in improved protein digestibility by 25-40% ( Teferra et al., 2019 ). More recently, clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) gene-editing technique was used to develop sorghum variants with improved protein quality (increased lysine content) and digestibility ( Li et al., 2018 ) thus presenting a new opportunity for more rapid and precise sorghum improvement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These covalent protein–protein interactions in sorghum endosperm limit sorghum use in food applications. Sorghum protein body mutants with a high‐protein‐digestibility trait have been shown to reduce sorghum endosperm protein crosslinking during hydrothermal processing due to burying of the high cysteine protein fractions (β and γ‐kafirin) in the interior of the protein bodies (Oria et al., 2000; Teferra et al., 2019). This trait is currently under development to produce varieties with improved endosperm functionality in food systems (Teferra et al., 2019; Tesso et al., 2008).…”
Section: Mechanisms Of Protein–starch Interactions and Their Effect O...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sorghum protein body mutants with a high‐protein‐digestibility trait have been shown to reduce sorghum endosperm protein crosslinking during hydrothermal processing due to burying of the high cysteine protein fractions (β and γ‐kafirin) in the interior of the protein bodies (Oria et al., 2000; Teferra et al., 2019). This trait is currently under development to produce varieties with improved endosperm functionality in food systems (Teferra et al., 2019; Tesso et al., 2008). Maize also contains cysteine‐rich prolamins (β‐ and γ‐zein) within the endosperm that are known to exhibit protein crosslinking (Anderson & Lamsal, 2011; Shewry & Halford, 2002); however, zein does not have the same impact on starch functionality (Ezeogu et al., 2008).…”
Section: Mechanisms Of Protein–starch Interactions and Their Effect O...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The WSI is a measure how much flour can be dissolved in water and the WAI is a measure how much how water can be absorbed into a mass of flour. These two measurements are important for flour-based food products and are an indicator of quality as they convey functionality with other food ingredients (Teferra et al, 2019).The waxy hybrids and the waxy check hybrid had statistically higher WSI values than a nonwaxy and heterozygous waxy quality checks (Table 5). Alternatively, the heterozygous waxy and nonwaxy check hybrids had statistically higher WAI than all tested waxy hybrids.…”
Section: Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%