2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.01.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of enamel after various stripping methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

7
66
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
7
66
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…6,8,10,12 Polishing should decrease but not completely eliminate these enamel irregularities, 1,8,10,17 which are still clearly visible at SEM observation 1 year after stripping. 15 Under these circumstances plaque accumulation could be expected even after intensive hygiene, including flossing which cannot dislodge plaque from artificial grooves.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…6,8,10,12 Polishing should decrease but not completely eliminate these enamel irregularities, 1,8,10,17 which are still clearly visible at SEM observation 1 year after stripping. 15 Under these circumstances plaque accumulation could be expected even after intensive hygiene, including flossing which cannot dislodge plaque from artificial grooves.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…6,7 Various stripping methods are available including abrasive strips, diamond-coated disks and tungsten carbide or diamond burs, 1 not without some possible detrimental effects on the integrity of proximal enamel. 8,9 Qualitative SEM evaluations have shown that all stripping methods affect enamel morphology, leaving furrows and scratches which cannot be eliminated by subsequent polishing. 1,6,8,[10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] Surface-roughness tests are consistent with SEM evaluations, suggesting that all stripping methods produce ''significantly rougher surfaces with many grooves and furrows'' than intact enamel, as reported by Arman et al 8 These enamel irregularities might facilitate plaque and bacteria retention, 6,10,11,15 and abraded enamel appears to be more susceptible to demineralization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 The procedure can be performed using several methods: (1) air rotor stripping with fine tungsten-carbide or diamond burs, (2) the use of diamond-coated stripping disks, or (3) the use of hand-held or motor-driven abrasive strips. 1,[5][6][7] Widespread acceptance of IPR has been hindered by the overarching notion that abraded enamel may be more susceptible to caries formation, despite the lack of evidence demonstrating an increased risk of caries on reduced teeth. 1 In a clinical study that involved IPR followed by polishing, Zachrisson et al 8 concluded that IPR does not negatively affect the health of the reduced teeth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La solución a estos problemas enfatiza la estrecha relación que debe existir entre ortodoncista, periodoncista y protesista para obtener resultados que beneficien a largo plazo al paciente. Por otro lado, se ha incrementado la terapia no extraccionista dentro de los tratamientos ortodóncicos, ganando popularidad la reducción interproximal de esmalte como parte de un procedimiento conservador [2,3]. …”
unclassified