2016
DOI: 10.1002/mas.21500
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Qualitative and quantitative characterization of protein biotherapeutics with liquid chromatography mass spectrometry

Abstract: In the last decade, the advancement of liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC/MS) techniques has enabled their broad application in protein characterization, both quantitatively and qualitatively. Owing to certain important merits of LC/MS techniques (e.g., high selectivity, flexibility, and rapid method development), LC/MS assays are often deemed as preferable alternatives to conventional methods (e.g., ligand-binding assays) for the analysis of protein biotherapeutics. At the discovery and development s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
51
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 214 publications
(341 reference statements)
0
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently, an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is general method that has been extensively applied for measuring blood concentrations of therapeutic mAbs. Recently, numerous efforts have been made to develop another quantification method of mAbs using LC/MS/MS [3, 4]. On the other hand, a robust method to assess structures of therapeutic mAbs in the body has not been developed to date in spite of their structural heterogeneities [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is general method that has been extensively applied for measuring blood concentrations of therapeutic mAbs. Recently, numerous efforts have been made to develop another quantification method of mAbs using LC/MS/MS [3, 4]. On the other hand, a robust method to assess structures of therapeutic mAbs in the body has not been developed to date in spite of their structural heterogeneities [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sensitivity is the primary concern because of the large molecular weights of proteins, the high protein contents in most biomatrices, and importantly the high chemical noises. 5 High-flow LC-MS is commonly employed in pharmaceutical and clinical applications as it affords short cycles and acceptable robustness. However, it often leads to compromised sensitivity and thus becomes less applicable to quantify biomarkers or protein biotherapeutics at low (and biologically relevant) concentrations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 To address this limitation, nano-LC-MS-based methods have been developed, 3,710 but several disadvantages have been reported. 5,11,12 First, the loading capacity for nano-LC-MS is low, leading to compromised concentration sensitivity (i.e., sensitivity expressed in concentration) in biological matrices, despite its high mass sensitivity. 5,12,13 As a result, enrichment and fractionation procedures (e.g., gel or immunoaffinity separation to reduce matrix components) are often employed prior to nano-LC-MS. Second, its relatively poor operational robustness, the extra efforts required for its maintenance, and its relatively low analytical throughput (e.g., each run is >40 min unless a highly selective enrichment is used 3 ) limit its applications in large-cohort analyses.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…LC-MS/MS has become an attractive technique to measure protein biomarkers in biological samples due to its superior selectivity and specificity [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33]. The LC-MS/MS approach quantifies a protein by selectively analyzing an appropriate surrogate peptide (SP) derived from the target analyte using multiple reaction monitoring (MRM).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%