2016
DOI: 10.2196/publichealth.5024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Qualitative Analysis of Cognitive Interviews With School Children: A Web-Based Food Intake Questionnaire

Abstract: BackgroundThe use of computers to administer dietary assessment questionnaires has shown potential, particularly due to the variety of interactive features that can attract and sustain children’s attention. Cognitive interviews can help researchers to gain insights into how children understand and elaborate their response processes in this type of questionnaire.ObjectiveTo present the cognitive interview results of children who answered the WebCAAFE, a Web-based questionnaire, to obtain an in-depth understandi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to Fernandes et al [34], two researchers coded the scripts independently and manually using a thematic matrix technique, within the framework of inductive coding. On completion of the coding, analyses were compared, any discrepancies were considered, and a consensus was reached.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to Fernandes et al [34], two researchers coded the scripts independently and manually using a thematic matrix technique, within the framework of inductive coding. On completion of the coding, analyses were compared, any discrepancies were considered, and a consensus was reached.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the qualitative analysis, as in the study by Davies et al [45], 2 researchers coded the transcripts independently and manually using a thematic matrix technique within the framework of inductive coding. Upon completion of the coding, analyses were compared, any discrepancies were considered, and a consensus was reached.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%