2021
DOI: 10.1002/mma.7308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Qualitative analysis for a system of anisotropic parabolic equations with sign‐changing logarithmic nonlinearity

Abstract: The main purpose of this paper is to discuss the global well-posedness, asymptotic behavior, and blow-up of solutions in finite time for a parabolic system of equations driven by the (p(x), q(x))-Laplacian operator with variable exponents and sign-changing nonlinearity. More precisely, we considerwhere Ω ⊂ R N is a smooth bounded domain, N ≥ 1, p, q, s ∶ Ω → R + are continuous functions and satisfy some conditions. The main characteristic of this paper is to study the global existence, asymptotic behavior, and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(49 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the author showed a polynomial decay estimate in the L 2 ‐norm for the solutions of this problem. Finally, we refer the reader to [36, 37] where the author has discussed the global existence, asymptotic behavior, and blow‐up of solutions for classes of parabolic equations involving the pfalse(xfalse)$p(x)$‐Laplacian with logarithmic nonlinearity. Notice that, if s1$s\rightarrow 1^{-}$ and q=2$q=2$, then the equation in (1.1) reduces the following one: 117.0ptuttbadbreak−Δpugoodbreak=ulog(|u|),0.28em0.28em0.28emwhere0.28em0.28emΔpugoodbreak=divfalse(false|ufalse|p2u).false(normalPfalse)$$\begin{equation*} \hspace*{117pt}u_{tt}-\Delta _{p}u=u\log (|u|),\;\;\; \text{where}\;\;\Delta _{p}u=\text{div}(|\nabla u|^{p-2}\nabla u).\qquad\hspace*{117pt} \mathrm{{(P)}} \end{equation*}$$In this paper, we shall show that solving a wave equation involving the nonlinear fractional p ‐Laplacian via the Galerkin method is much easier than solving the usual quasilinear wave equations like those in ( P ).…”
Section: Introduction and The Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, the author showed a polynomial decay estimate in the L 2 ‐norm for the solutions of this problem. Finally, we refer the reader to [36, 37] where the author has discussed the global existence, asymptotic behavior, and blow‐up of solutions for classes of parabolic equations involving the pfalse(xfalse)$p(x)$‐Laplacian with logarithmic nonlinearity. Notice that, if s1$s\rightarrow 1^{-}$ and q=2$q=2$, then the equation in (1.1) reduces the following one: 117.0ptuttbadbreak−Δpugoodbreak=ulog(|u|),0.28em0.28em0.28emwhere0.28em0.28emΔpugoodbreak=divfalse(false|ufalse|p2u).false(normalPfalse)$$\begin{equation*} \hspace*{117pt}u_{tt}-\Delta _{p}u=u\log (|u|),\;\;\; \text{where}\;\;\Delta _{p}u=\text{div}(|\nabla u|^{p-2}\nabla u).\qquad\hspace*{117pt} \mathrm{{(P)}} \end{equation*}$$In this paper, we shall show that solving a wave equation involving the nonlinear fractional p ‐Laplacian via the Galerkin method is much easier than solving the usual quasilinear wave equations like those in ( P ).…”
Section: Introduction and The Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the author showed a polynomial decay estimate in the 𝐿 2 -norm for the solutions of this problem. Finally, we refer the reader to [36,37] where the author has discussed the global existence, asymptotic behavior, and blow-up of solutions for classes of parabolic equations involving the 𝑝(𝑥)-Laplacian with logarithmic nonlinearity. Notice that, if 𝑠 → 1 − and 𝑞 = 2, then the equation in (1.1) reduces the following one: 𝑢 𝑡𝑡 − Δ 𝑝 𝑢 = 𝑢 log(|𝑢|), where Δ 𝑝 𝑢 = div(|∇𝑢| 𝑝−2 ∇𝑢).…”
Section: Introduction and The Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%