Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Achieving effective zonal isolation within long reach horizontal wells via conventional means, such as cement or swell packers, is becoming increasingly challenging to the industry. The longer step outs limit the Equivalent Circulation Density (ECD) due to frac/pore pressure limitations. Subsequent complex stimulation operations impose higher differential pressure (dP) across the packers. To address these challenges, a novel design was introduced, effectively creating an expandable metal, sleeve-type annular barrier that allows cementless completions and effective zonal isolation. The design of the new annular barriers, assembled on a full bore liner, minimizes the running outside diameter (OD) whilst delivering a high differential pressure seal even within a washed out hole. The qualification process was designed to meet the International Organization for Standardization ISO14310 V3 standard and to simulate the lifecycle of the packer during acid stimulation and later-life water management. The benefits to operators include increased reliability and certainty for success, both in the short-term and over the life of the wells. This paper reports recent implementation of the new annular barrier to meet the unique challenges of annular high pressure containment. Findings are supported by specific case examples, and the paper includes a discussion on design, application and performance.
Achieving effective zonal isolation within long reach horizontal wells via conventional means, such as cement or swell packers, is becoming increasingly challenging to the industry. The longer step outs limit the Equivalent Circulation Density (ECD) due to frac/pore pressure limitations. Subsequent complex stimulation operations impose higher differential pressure (dP) across the packers. To address these challenges, a novel design was introduced, effectively creating an expandable metal, sleeve-type annular barrier that allows cementless completions and effective zonal isolation. The design of the new annular barriers, assembled on a full bore liner, minimizes the running outside diameter (OD) whilst delivering a high differential pressure seal even within a washed out hole. The qualification process was designed to meet the International Organization for Standardization ISO14310 V3 standard and to simulate the lifecycle of the packer during acid stimulation and later-life water management. The benefits to operators include increased reliability and certainty for success, both in the short-term and over the life of the wells. This paper reports recent implementation of the new annular barrier to meet the unique challenges of annular high pressure containment. Findings are supported by specific case examples, and the paper includes a discussion on design, application and performance.
Mature fields present major challenges for drilling and the installation of casing and liners. These fields typically exhibit depleted intervals with narrow pressure windows located in the same hole interval, posing unique challenges for installation and cementing of casings or liners. Fluid losses in the depleted intervals coupled with the inability to manage the annular fluid level can lead to differential sticking and stuck pipe scenarios while using conventional drilling and casing installation methods. Furthermore, even if the casing or liner is landed at its planned depth, the subsequent cementing operation offers its own challenges with little chance of a positive outcome with conventional cementing methods potentially resulting in significant non-productive time (NPT). These challenges provide fertile ground for the development and implementation of unconventional drilling technologies such as drilling with liner (DwL) and managed pressure drilling solutions to enable operators to meet their well construction objectives where conventional methods have little chance for success. The DwL process allows a hazard interval to be isolated and cemented in a single trip resulting in less risk and exposure compared with the use of conventional drilling methods. This technology has found its niche in wells where zones must be drilled which have a high probability of hole problems such as fluid loss, narrow drilling margins, depletion and instability, leading to excessive NPT. Still, the subsequent cement job typically involves pumping cement through the casing bit into the liner-open hole annulus with the hope of obtaining the required formation integrity test (FIT) value while also satisfying annular and zonal isolation requirements A North Sea operator has experienced sustained annulus casing pressures in wells in a mature chalk field. This is due to lack of cement isolation and cement channeling after a 9-5/8 in. drilling liner is drilled through a pressured shale overburden interval into a depleted chalk interval with the liner typically becoming stuck. Conventional liner cementing methods were not providing the necessary hydraulic or mechanical isolation over the life of these wells due to the very narrow pressure windows exposed in the drilling liner interval and the lack of ability to rotate the liner above the liner stuck point during cementing. An international oilfield service provider collaborated with the operator and together designed a cementing solution using strategic deployment of multiple remotely operated cementing port collars on the drilling liner to meet the required cementing objectives. Also included on the drilling liner are a metal expandable annular casing packer and hydraulic casing swivel designed and configured to be fully compatible with the planned hydraulic DwL system. This paper will present the DwL system design process along with the related procedures enabling the cementing port collars to be remotely activated with the liner having the ability to be rotated above the stuck pipe section and cementing operations commencing directly after reaching total depth.
It is well recognized that a failed isolation can have detrimental consequences on HSE, well productivity, and life of the well. This paper presents the case history of a metal expandable annular barrier used to provide cement assurance via a hydraulic seal in a challenging side-tracked well in West Africa. The initial well was shut in shortly after being brought on production due to excessive precipitation of scale. Investigations identified a shallow formation separated from the production zone by a thin shale section, and prompted questions on the effectiveness of the cement across the production casing. The metal expandable barrier was then selected to assure sealing in the side-tracked well. Two barriers were mounted on the 9-5/8" casing and deployed through the milled window. Following the cement operation, hydraulic pressure was applied to expand rapidly the sleeve bodies in wet cement and set against the 12 ¼" borehole thereby creating an impenetrable seal. The sealing was ultimately confirmed by the absence of scale during production compared to the previous experience of shut-in after only 18 hours of production. The barriers are seal backed stainless steel sleeves. The expansion process increases the differential pressure capabilities of the packers due to work hardening of the metal sleeves. This also provides a high degree of anchoring. The barriers are full-bore, highly customizable, and are tested ISO14310. The application was for cement assurance but this technology is also applied as zonal isolation in cement-less completions. The metallurgy allows the packer to shape fit into either an open hole with irregular geometry or inside a casing to preclude annular pressure build up by giving a life-of-well reliable seal. Stopping migrating fluids behind pipe has become a critical HSE issue to the industry. The application of this technology allows preventing loss of life and resources.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.