2008
DOI: 10.1590/s0021-75572008000400005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Qualidade de vida de crianças e adolescentes de São Paulo: confiabilidade e validade da versão brasileira do questionário genérico Pediatric Quality of Life InventoryTM versão 4.0

Abstract: The tool demonstrated reliability, validity, and the administration was fast and easy. Quality of life in patients with rheumatic diseases was significantly lower than in the healthy control group, supporting the necessity of a comprehensive approach to rheumatic disease management, focused on the psychosocial dimensions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
65
0
21

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 159 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(35 reference statements)
2
65
0
21
Order By: Relevance
“…This agreement is greater for the physical than for the psychosocial domain. Several studies tally with ours in observing both the strength of the relations and the fact that they are higher for the physical dimension than for the emotional and social dimensions of health state [14,23,26,27,30] Eiser’s systematic review [31] reports values for good agreement ( r  ≥ 0.50) between the assessment of the children and that of their parents in the domains that reflect physical activity, functioning and certain symptoms, but weak agreement ( r  < 0.30) for the emotional and social domains of HRQoL. It is also assumed that there is a better agreement for more easily observed behaviors associated with the functional state, and a poorer for cognitive or emotional qualities like fear and anxiety.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This agreement is greater for the physical than for the psychosocial domain. Several studies tally with ours in observing both the strength of the relations and the fact that they are higher for the physical dimension than for the emotional and social dimensions of health state [14,23,26,27,30] Eiser’s systematic review [31] reports values for good agreement ( r  ≥ 0.50) between the assessment of the children and that of their parents in the domains that reflect physical activity, functioning and certain symptoms, but weak agreement ( r  < 0.30) for the emotional and social domains of HRQoL. It is also assumed that there is a better agreement for more easily observed behaviors associated with the functional state, and a poorer for cognitive or emotional qualities like fear and anxiety.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Other languages have also followed the same methodology, including German [19], UK English [20], Russian [6], Greek [21], Argentinean Spanish [22] and Brazilian Portuguese [23] languages. For the adopted methodology and the results obtained, it can be said that the Portuguese versions of PedsQL 4.0 are semantically equivalent, meaning that PedsQL items were also valid for the Portuguese context.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results can be interpreted by total score or grouped according to the areas: Psychosocial Health and Physical Ability. The score is determined in absolute value ranging from 0 to 100, so that the higher the score, the better the quality of life 17,18 . Motor Development Scale was used to analyzed the psychomotor profile of the children of this study.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To create a summary score of overall quality of life, the 23 items were computed, which includes the four domains of the tool 18. This questionnaire was validated into Portuguese by Klatchoian et al for children and adolescents (aged between 2 and 18 years) 19. It was applied in a classroom with a capacity of about 30 adolescents, with the assistance of at least two examiners.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Para criar um escore sumário da qualidade de vida total, os 23 itens foram computados, o que abrange os quatro domínios do instrumento 18. Este questionário foi validado para língua portuguesa por Klatchoian et al para crianças e adolescentes (idade entre 2 e 18 anos) 19. Sua aplicação aconteceu em uma sala de aula com capacidade para cerca de 30 adolescentes, com o auxílio de pelo menos dois avaliadores.…”
Section: Métodounclassified