2009 6th International Symposium on Mechatronics and Its Applications 2009
DOI: 10.1109/isma.2009.5164788
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quadrotor control using feedback linearization with dynamic extension

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Examples of classical control approaches used to track trajectories with quadrocopters are PID schemes (Zhou et al 2010a), backstepping control techniques (Bouabdallah and Siegwart 2005;Mokhtari and Benallegue 2004;Zuo 2010;Madani and Benallegue 2006;Lee et al 2009;Raffo et al 2008) and feedback linearization (Zhou et al 2010b;Al-Hiddabi 2009). Other common strategies are trajectory linearization control (Zhu and Huo 2010), constrained finitetime optimal control (Alexis et al 2010), LQ optimal solutions (Bauer et al 2009) or Model Predictive Control (Castillo et al 2007).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples of classical control approaches used to track trajectories with quadrocopters are PID schemes (Zhou et al 2010a), backstepping control techniques (Bouabdallah and Siegwart 2005;Mokhtari and Benallegue 2004;Zuo 2010;Madani and Benallegue 2006;Lee et al 2009;Raffo et al 2008) and feedback linearization (Zhou et al 2010b;Al-Hiddabi 2009). Other common strategies are trajectory linearization control (Zhu and Huo 2010), constrained finitetime optimal control (Alexis et al 2010), LQ optimal solutions (Bauer et al 2009) or Model Predictive Control (Castillo et al 2007).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By the rotation of four rotor wings four rotor UAV can produce the control action. Among them, motor 1 M and motor 3 M have the clockwise rotations respectively with the angular velocity 1 ω and the angular velocity 3 ω to respectively generated the thrust 1 f and the thrust 3 f . At the same time, the other two motors ( 2 M and 4 M ) have the counter-clockwise rotations respectively with the angular velocity 2 ω and the angular velocity 4 ω to respectively generated the thrust 2 f and the thrust 4 f .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is sometimes called a quadrotor or a qudrocopter. There have been many researches carried out on control and trajectory planning of quadcopters; refer to [1], [2], [3], [4], [5] and references therein.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The (differential) flatness property is useful for trajectory generation and the property of dynamic feedback linearizability makes tracking controller design straightforward. These two properties have been shown to hold for the quadcopter only locally in an open subset of the configuration space of the quadcopter dynamics [1], [3], [5], but not globally. In [3], [5] a flat output is constructed with the position and the yaw angle of the quadcopter and the consequent parameterization of the state and control variables in terms of the flat output has a singularity which naturally comes from the use of Euler angles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%