1994
DOI: 10.1006/jdeq.1994.1049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quadratic Systems with Center and Their Perturbations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
116
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 226 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
116
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Denote I = col(R, M, X). Then I(h) satisfies a Picard-Fuchs system of the form I = (Ah + B)I (22) and the validity of the result in the proposition depends on whether the matrix A is lowertriangular. To check this, we can use the system (1.5) derived in [15].…”
Section: L(h) = Ax(h) + B(h − H L )R(h) + Cm(h) (A B C = Constants)mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Denote I = col(R, M, X). Then I(h) satisfies a Picard-Fuchs system of the form I = (Ah + B)I (22) and the validity of the result in the proposition depends on whether the matrix A is lowertriangular. To check this, we can use the system (1.5) derived in [15].…”
Section: L(h) = Ax(h) + B(h − H L )R(h) + Cm(h) (A B C = Constants)mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The order of the Poincaré-Pontryagin function M k (h) (also called Melnikov integral), giving the possible maximum number of zeros, is known only in the quadratic case and in the symmetric cubic case (when the perturbed field possesses central symmetry). Thus, the cyclicity under arbitrary quadratic perturbations of the period annulus of a reversible quadratic Hamiltonian vector field is determined by the second Poincaré-Pontryagin integral, except for the Hamiltonian triangle, whose cyclicity is determined by the thirdorder variation [14,22]. In general, the order of the Poincaré-Pontryagin integral which generates a module of Abelian integrals of a maximal possible dimension is unknown, and its determination appears to be a difficult task involving the solution of the corresponding center-focus problem and viewing the structure of the related center manifold.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…systems which have at least two real invariant lines) which have a center, we do not do this here, not to conflict with the terminology in the literature and in particular with [76]. We stress that, as already indicated above, in this work we use the notation L-V-C to denote the family of systems which can be reduced by affine transformations and time rescaling to the Kapteyn-Bautin normal form with a = 0 = b + d, analogously to the terminology in [76].…”
Section: Normal Forms and Bifurcation Diagramsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This terminology, was introduced in [76] for the family of systems which using our coordinates is defined by the equations a = 0 and b+d = 0. In general in the literature, the term Lotka-Volterra was used for quadratic systems which have at least two real invariant lines.…”
Section: Normal Forms and Bifurcation Diagramsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quadratic polynomial vector fields with a center can be divided in four dosses: Q^, Qf, Q § and Q^ (Zoladek [30]), called Lotka-Volterra case, Hamiltonian case, reversible case and codimension 4 case respectively. In this section we shall study the Poincare-Pontryagin functions…”
Section: Abelian Integrals Which Arise In Polynomial Perturbations Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%