Advanced Photonics With Second-Order Optically Nonlinear Processes 1999
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-0850-1_42
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quadratic Solitons: Past, Present, and Future

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(3)], E = 12000. We see that, with the increase of the mismatch β, the energy of the FF component of the spinning soliton increases, similar to the case of nonspinning solitons in pure χ (2) media [42,45,46,47].…”
Section: The Model and Spinning Solitonssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…(3)], E = 12000. We see that, with the increase of the mismatch β, the energy of the FF component of the spinning soliton increases, similar to the case of nonspinning solitons in pure χ (2) media [42,45,46,47].…”
Section: The Model and Spinning Solitonssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…However, parametric interactions can strongly modify the dynamics of spatial beams or temporal pulses. The parametrically coupled waves in a medium with quadratic nonlinearity may experience mutual spatial focusing or temporal compression and lock together into a stationary state, quadratic soliton (see Sukhorukov [1988]; Torner [1998]; Kivshar [1997]; Etrich, Lederer, Malomed, Peschel, and Peschel [2000]; Torruellas, Kivshar, and Stegeman [2001]; Boardman and Sukhorukov [2001]; Buryak, Di Trapani, Skryabin, and Trillo [2002], and references therein).…”
Section: Wave Interchange and Signal Deflectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Respectively, the first sub-process is responsible for the generation of the SH field, with the most efficient conversion observed at ∆k = 0, while the second sub-process, also called cascading, can be associated with an effective intensity-dependent change of the phase of the fundamental harmonic (∼ d 2 /∆k), which is similar to that of the cubic nonlinearity (DeSalvo, Hagan, Sheik-Bahae, Stegeman, Vanstryland, and Vanherzeele [1992]; Stegeman, Hagan, and Torner [1996]; Assanto, Stegeman, Sheik-Bahae, and Vanstryland [1995]). This latter effect is responsible for the generation of the so-called quadratic solitons, two-wave parametric soliton composed of the mutually coupled fundamental and second-harmonic components (Sukhorukov [1988]; Torner [1998]; Kivshar [1997]; Etrich, Lederer, Malomed, Peschel, and Peschel [2000]; Torruellas, Kivshar, and Stegeman [2001]; Boardman and Sukhorukov [2001]; Buryak, Di Trapani, Skryabin, and Trillo [2002], and references therein).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This follows from the two i n tegral relations which c a n be obtained from the variational principle (13) and directly from the stationary equations (11,12) after multiplying the rst equation by 1 , the second one by 2 2 , with summation of the obtained results, followed by their integration over x (for details, see 11]). In the case when the operators are negative de nite, the following conditions must be ful lled: (15) has to be a positive q u a n tity. As a result, the last inequality (16) reads as…”
Section: Basic Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%