2016 IEEE 55th Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/cdc.2016.7798532
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quadratic performance of primal-dual methods with application to secondary frequency control of power systems

Abstract: Primal-dual gradient methods have recently attracted interest as a set of systematic techniques for distributed and online optimization. One of the proposed applications has been optimal frequency regulation in power systems, where the primal-dual algorithm is implemented online as a dynamic controller. In this context however, the presence of external disturbances makes quantifying input/output performance important. Here we use the H2 system norm to quantify how effectively these distributed algorithms rejec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, in many applications including distributed computing over networks [32], [33], coordination in vehicular formations [34], and control of power systems [35], additive white noise is a convenient abstraction for the robustness analysis of distributed control strategies [33] and of first-order optimization algorithms [36], [37]. Motivated by this observation, in this paper we consider the scenario in which a white stochastic noise with zero mean and identity covariance is added to the iterates of standard first-order algorithms: gradient descent, Polyak's heavy-ball method, and Nesterov's accelerated algorithm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, in many applications including distributed computing over networks [32], [33], coordination in vehicular formations [34], and control of power systems [35], additive white noise is a convenient abstraction for the robustness analysis of distributed control strategies [33] and of first-order optimization algorithms [36], [37]. Motivated by this observation, in this paper we consider the scenario in which a white stochastic noise with zero mean and identity covariance is added to the iterates of standard first-order algorithms: gradient descent, Polyak's heavy-ball method, and Nesterov's accelerated algorithm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the broadcast averaging algorithm does not scale with the system size, further for sufficiently large networks and moderate damping coefficients, the performance improvement in terms of disturbance rejection over the plain vanilla gradient ascent algorithm in [22] is significant.…”
Section: Theorem 31 (Performance Of Broadcast Algorithm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The special case (ii) indicates that the H 2 norm can be suppressed by increasing γ sufficiently. Note in particular that in the high-gain limit (22), the H 2 norm is independent of system size and identical to the broadcast performance (8). This appears to be a fundamental difference between the averaging-based controllers and the open-loop primal-dual controller (12).…”
Section: Theorem 43 (Distributed Averaging Performance)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We dedicate Section IV to present a relevant power systems example where we present the AGC problem in a PD form then illustrate the error bounds derived in Section III. Note that our results can apply to nonautonomous PD dynamics with general objective functions, while most recent related work deals with autonomous PD dynamics [13] or quadratic objective functions [14]. The ISS analysis in [15], which characterizes error bounds to fixed saddle points, is relevant to the estimates derived in this work.…”
Section: B Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Matrix E describes the network topology, B the rescaled line susceptances, D the rescaled damping ratios, and k the secondary control gains. The PD formż = −∂ ω , ∂ p E , ∂ uagc associated with the Lagrangian function (30) recovers frequency dynamics and the simplified AGC [14], [25]. For the perturbed system, we consider an extension of the model with additional turbine delays modeled asu agc = to theû agc , rather than the AGC effort u agc .…”
Section: Numerical Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%