2013
DOI: 10.1002/pssb.201349031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quadratic‐in‐magnetization permittivity and conductivity tensor in cubic crystals

Abstract: We present diagonal and off‐diagonal elements of the permittivity and conductivity tensor up to the second order in magnetization for cubic crystals. We express all tensor elements as a function of a general sample orientation, for arbitrary magnetization direction and for (001), (011), and (111) surface orientations. Finally, we discuss, how to extract values of quadratic elements G of the second‐order permittivity tensors for different sample surface orientations from both experiment and ab initio calculatio… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to express G-elements for crystals with cubic symmetry, the elements can be rearranged defining G s = G 11 −(G 12 +G 21 )/2 and ∆Γ = (G 12 −G 21 )/2. Note that alternative way used to express anisotropy of the permittivity is ∆G = G 11 − 2G 44 − (G 12 + G 21 )/2 [16,42]. In case of cubic crystals owning point O h symmetry, G 12 = G 21 and hence G s = G 11 − G 12 , ∆Γ = 0 [40].…”
Section: Permittivity Tensor In Cubic Crystalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to express G-elements for crystals with cubic symmetry, the elements can be rearranged defining G s = G 11 −(G 12 +G 21 )/2 and ∆Γ = (G 12 −G 21 )/2. Note that alternative way used to express anisotropy of the permittivity is ∆G = G 11 − 2G 44 − (G 12 + G 21 )/2 [16,42]. In case of cubic crystals owning point O h symmetry, G 12 = G 21 and hence G s = G 11 − G 12 , ∆Γ = 0 [40].…”
Section: Permittivity Tensor In Cubic Crystalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We conclude this appendix by explaining the relationship between terminology used in this paper (components of the effective permittivity tensor ε eff ) and the notation of "quadratic magneto-optic tensor components" [60,61] used elsewhere [62][63][64]. The basic conceptual difference between the two approaches is whether M is kept fixed and different polarizations of light are considered (the former approach) or vice versa (the latter approach).…”
Section: Consider An Electromagnetic Wave E( Rt) = E 0 E I(kz−ωt)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Namely, G s = ε − ε ⊥ for M 100 and 2G 44 = ε − ε ⊥ for M 110 , where the parallel ( ) and perpendicular (⊥) symbols denote the directions of linear light polarization (i.e. applied electric field) with respect to the magnetization direction, respectively [40].…”
Section: Theory Of Linear and Quadratic Mokementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our separation process of different QMOKE contributions is stemming from 8-directional method [10], but we use a combination of just 4 directions and a sample rotation by 45 • as will be described later in the text. This approach allows us to isolate QMOKE spectra that stem mostly from individual MO parameters and thus subsequently determine spectral dependencies of G s = G 11 − G 12 and 2G 44 , denoting MO parameters quadratic in M [17,[38][39][40]. Therefore, we start our study on FM bcc Fe thin films grown on MgO(001) substrates to get a basic understanding of QMOKE spectroscopy for further studies of AFMs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%