2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2101.01862
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quadratic Chabauty for modular curves: Algorithms and examples

Abstract: A. We describe how the quadratic Chabauty method may be applied to determine the set of rational points on modular curves of genus g whose Jacobians have Mordell-Weil rank g. This extends our previous work on the split Cartan curve of level 13 and allows us to consider modular curves that may have few known rational points or nontrivial local height contributions away from our working prime. We illustrate our algorithms with a number of examples where we determine the set of rational points on several modular … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(2) Since the determinant of E;p is the mod p cyclotomic character, we have thatP E;p .G K / Â PSL 2 .F p / if and only if p p 2 K.When this is the case, by Lemma 2.7, we see that each index 2 subgroup of the projective image is split when p Á 1 .mod 4/ and non-split when p Á 3 .mod 4/. By part(1), it follows in both cases that the congruences between E and each of the three twists are all symplectic. Now suppose that p p … K. By Lemma 2.7 again, exactly one of the three subgroups is split when p Á 1 .mod 4/, and exactly one is non-split when p Á 3 .mod 4/, so in both cases exactly one congruence is symplectic.…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(2) Since the determinant of E;p is the mod p cyclotomic character, we have thatP E;p .G K / Â PSL 2 .F p / if and only if p p 2 K.When this is the case, by Lemma 2.7, we see that each index 2 subgroup of the projective image is split when p Á 1 .mod 4/ and non-split when p Á 3 .mod 4/. By part(1), it follows in both cases that the congruences between E and each of the three twists are all symplectic. Now suppose that p p … K. By Lemma 2.7 again, exactly one of the three subgroups is split when p Á 1 .mod 4/, and exactly one is non-split when p Á 3 .mod 4/, so in both cases exactly one congruence is symplectic.…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…In Corollary 1.9 of [2] there is a list of 3 rational j -invariants of elliptic curves over Q satisfying (iv); it has recently been shown (see [1]) that the associated genus 3 modular curve X S 4 .13/ found explicitly in [2] has no more rational points, and hence that this list is complete. By Theorem 2.4, none of these curves is mod 13 congruent to a twist of another of them (including itself); the same is true for the curves and values of p in case (v).…”
Section: Further Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also compute the Q-curves corresponding to each non-cuspidal point in the set. The prime levels N = 67, 73, 103, 107, 161, 167, 191 were approached using quadratic Chabauty in [5] and [11]. We compute X 0 (N ) * (Q) for the remaining square-free levels…”
Section: Theorem 12 ([34 Theorem B])mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When N is a prime power, X 0 (N ) * = X 0 (N ) + , since w N is the only non-trivial Atkin-Lehner involution. For N prime and genus(X 0 (N ) * ) ∈ {2, 3}, the sets X 0 (N ) * (Q) were computed in [5,11]. For N prime and genus(X 0 (N ) * ) ∈ {4, 5, 6}, the same was carried out by the first three authors and Vishal Arul, Lea Beneish, Mingjie Chen, and Boya Wen in [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,4). Hence the model (13.1) of E a,b is minimal at 2 and E a,b has additive potential good reduction at 2.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%