Molecular Dissection of Complex Traits 2019
DOI: 10.1201/9780429117770-10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

QTL Analyses: Power, Precision, and Accuracy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
215
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 238 publications
(227 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
11
215
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, analyzing the collared flycatcher data allowed students to consider the importance of accounting for repeated phenotypic measurements when conducting a GWAS. Students were encouraged to critically evaluate effect size estimates from GWAS in light of the Beavis effect (Beavis, 1998), and the "winner's curse" (Kraft, 2008), which state that the effect sizes of loci passing a stringent statistical significance thresholds in QTL mapping or GWAS analyses are often upwardly biased, particularly in studies with low statistical power.…”
Section: Genomewide Association Studies (Marty Kardos)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, analyzing the collared flycatcher data allowed students to consider the importance of accounting for repeated phenotypic measurements when conducting a GWAS. Students were encouraged to critically evaluate effect size estimates from GWAS in light of the Beavis effect (Beavis, 1998), and the "winner's curse" (Kraft, 2008), which state that the effect sizes of loci passing a stringent statistical significance thresholds in QTL mapping or GWAS analyses are often upwardly biased, particularly in studies with low statistical power.…”
Section: Genomewide Association Studies (Marty Kardos)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Beavis effect is named after a series of papers by William Beavis focused on QTL mapping (Beavis, 1994(Beavis, , 1998. Beavis showed through a series of simulations that limited sample size in QTL mapping populations had several adverse consequences on the inferences one could make.…”
Section: Beavis Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of twelve reproducible resistance QTL were mapped to ten different chromosomes (Table 3). Due to the relatively small mapping population size, it is very likely that QTL effects were overestimated (Beavis, 1998), and QTL with relatively high effects should therefore not necessarily be counted as major-effect QTL. Given that the FHB resistance levels in Bess were significantly greater than in NC-Neuse, we expected to find more QTL at which Bess alleles provided resistance compared with NC-Neuse alleles.…”
Section: Qtl Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%