2013
DOI: 10.1002/cem.2488
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

QSAR, docking and ADMET studies of camptothecin derivatives as inhibitors of DNA topoisomerase‐I

Abstract: In the present work, quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models of camptothecin derivatives against DNA Topoisomerase-I (DNA Topo-I) were developed by multiple linear regression method using leave-one-out validation approach. The r 2 and rCV 2 of the model were 0.89 and 0.86, respectively. The QSAR study indicates that chemical descriptors, namely Connectivity Index (order 1, standard), Electron Affinity (eV), Molecular Weight, Group Count (ether) are correlated well with activity. Further, scr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

6
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The external validation or predictive capacity of the derived model was judged by predictive r2(rpred2) as shown in the following equation: rpred2=1(normalYpred(test)normalY(test))2(normalY(test)normalY(training))2where Y pred (test) and Y (test) indicate the predicted and observed activity values, respectively, for test set compounds and normalY¯(training) indicates the average bioactivity of compound in the training set. An acceptable predictive power of a QSAR model (rpred2) should be >0.6 for the test set molecules 3335…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The external validation or predictive capacity of the derived model was judged by predictive r2(rpred2) as shown in the following equation: rpred2=1(normalYpred(test)normalY(test))2(normalY(test)normalY(training))2where Y pred (test) and Y (test) indicate the predicted and observed activity values, respectively, for test set compounds and normalY¯(training) indicates the average bioactivity of compound in the training set. An acceptable predictive power of a QSAR model (rpred2) should be >0.6 for the test set molecules 3335…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To find the possible bioactive conformations of control, compound 1 and its derivative 1e , the Sybyl‐X v1.3 interfaced with Surflex‐Dock program was used to dock the ligands into the active site of E. coli YojI protein. During docking procedure all parameters were assigned to there default values .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The calculated TPSA values of these compounds were within acceptable limits. The distribution of compounds in the human body was described by the predicted blood–brain barrier coefficient (logBB), apparent Caco-2 permeability, log Kp for skin permeability, volume of distribution and plasma protein binding (log Khsa for serum protein binding)424344. All compounds show poor aqueous solubility (Table 1 in Supplementary Information).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%