2017
DOI: 10.2112/si78-014.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

qPCR Detection of Early Life History StageChrysaora quinquecirrha(Sea Nettles) in Barnegat Bay, New Jersey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This technique has been used to detect rare (Jerde et al., 2011; Keskin et al., 2016; Simpfendorfer et al., 2016), invasive (Robson et al., 2016), and sporadically distributed species, including scyphozoan jellyfish. For example, Minamoto et al., (2017) used an eDNA approach to detect the presence of medusae of the Japanese sea nettle ( Chrysaora pacifica ) in Mazizuru Bay, Kyoto, while Gaynor et al., (2017) looked at the applicability of eDNA to detect early life stages of Chrysaora quinquecirrha in Barnegat Bay, New Jersey. However, to date, there has been no published works on the use of an eDNA approach to detect occurrence of venomous cubozoans and the focus has only been on ephyrae and medusa, not the benthic polyps.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technique has been used to detect rare (Jerde et al., 2011; Keskin et al., 2016; Simpfendorfer et al., 2016), invasive (Robson et al., 2016), and sporadically distributed species, including scyphozoan jellyfish. For example, Minamoto et al., (2017) used an eDNA approach to detect the presence of medusae of the Japanese sea nettle ( Chrysaora pacifica ) in Mazizuru Bay, Kyoto, while Gaynor et al., (2017) looked at the applicability of eDNA to detect early life stages of Chrysaora quinquecirrha in Barnegat Bay, New Jersey. However, to date, there has been no published works on the use of an eDNA approach to detect occurrence of venomous cubozoans and the focus has only been on ephyrae and medusa, not the benthic polyps.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a new marine ecological survey tool, eDNA-based techniques are non-invasive, environmentally friendly, and accurate, and they are expected to play an essential role in optimizing ecological studies of jellyfish [ 42 44 ]. Recent studies have highlighted the great potential of eDNA-based techniques in biodiversity investigation, spatial distribution detection, and early life history stage monitoring of jellyfish [ 45 48 ]. Metabarcoding, as one of the major eDNA-based techniques, has obvious advantages in providing broad-scale distribution data for multiple species from a single analysis and detecting unknown biodiversity previously not recorded, including “unexpected” invasive or non-native species [ 21 , 23 , 28 , 49 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, a study compared the zooplankton taxa recovered with nets and with eDNA of filtered water samples, and demonstrated eDNA to be particularly suitable for revealing gelatinous diversity (Govindarajan et al, 2021). However, eDNA studies focusing on gelatinous zooplankton still remain relatively scarce (Ames et al, 2021;Gaynor et al, 2017;Minamoto et al, 2017;Takasu et al, 2019).…”
Section: The Elusive Rare and Endangered: Edna As A Non-invasive Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%