2012 IFIP Wireless Days 2012
DOI: 10.1109/wd.2012.6402823
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

QoS provisioning in LTE-A networks with relay nodes

Abstract: Abstract-In the vision of heterogeneous networks, the Quality of Service provided by classic cellular systems is improved thanks to a jointly adoption of macro and small-range cells (i.e., micro, pico, and femtocells) working in the same area. This rationale has been also assimilated by 3GPP, which now proposes its possible exploitation in the upcoming Long Term Evolution-Advanced architecture. In this context, the wireless relay technology represents an interesting solution for extending the coverage of a mac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(21 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of R-UEs, both schedulers had a 100% satisfied user of the two traffic types. The authors of [13] proposed a resource allocation strategy that was able to effectively support and satisfy a QoS level for real-time applications LTE-A network with the existence of relay nodes, this was accomplished by extending their previous proposed Two-Level Scheduler approach in [14]. They adapted their Two-Level Scheduler to the relay technology by applying it to both the DeNB and the relay, and also by splitting the maximum delay on the access network from the DeNB to the terminal τi into two parts as follows:…”
Section: 𝜖 = 𝑁 𝑅 𝑁 𝑅 + 𝑁 𝑀 ⋅ 𝛿mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of R-UEs, both schedulers had a 100% satisfied user of the two traffic types. The authors of [13] proposed a resource allocation strategy that was able to effectively support and satisfy a QoS level for real-time applications LTE-A network with the existence of relay nodes, this was accomplished by extending their previous proposed Two-Level Scheduler approach in [14]. They adapted their Two-Level Scheduler to the relay technology by applying it to both the DeNB and the relay, and also by splitting the maximum delay on the access network from the DeNB to the terminal τi into two parts as follows:…”
Section: 𝜖 = 𝑁 𝑅 𝑁 𝑅 + 𝑁 𝑀 ⋅ 𝛿mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the classical MLWDF algorithm [8] , which possesses great performance in system TH-MLWDF algorithm is proposed in [9] to meet the QoS demands of various traffics in two-hop relay system. With the presence of RNs in the model, delay is divided into two parts as expressed in the formula (3), also shown in Fig.…”
Section: A Th-mlwdf Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…D UE-RN and D RN-eNB are preset delay threshold for traffic i from UE to its serving RN and from RN to the eNB, respectively. In [9], the target delays in two-hop links are set as follows:…”
Section: A Th-mlwdf Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations