2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpdc.2020.10.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

QoS provision in hierarchical and non-hierarchical switch architectures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The service level agreement to maintain the data in the cloud infrastructures plays vital role in business growth, as the agreement demands high level of Quality of Service (QoS) which encompasses the vital parameters of effective resource scheduling, availability of service, reduced response time, high level of throughput and improvised security for the sensitive data stored in the cloud data servers. The Quality of Service [2] is classified into two types namely service provider depending factors and service user depending factors. The effective resource scheduling, response time and throughput [3] were classified under service provider depending factors while the cost of service, scalable efficiency are classified under service user depending factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The service level agreement to maintain the data in the cloud infrastructures plays vital role in business growth, as the agreement demands high level of Quality of Service (QoS) which encompasses the vital parameters of effective resource scheduling, availability of service, reduced response time, high level of throughput and improvised security for the sensitive data stored in the cloud data servers. The Quality of Service [2] is classified into two types namely service provider depending factors and service user depending factors. The effective resource scheduling, response time and throughput [3] were classified under service provider depending factors while the cost of service, scalable efficiency are classified under service user depending factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%