2006 IEEE/IFIP Network Operations and Management Symposium NOMS 2006 2006
DOI: 10.1109/noms.2006.1687542
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

QoS Management and Congestion Control in Wireless Hotspots

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here the problem is to compare the various types of control using simulation. In the simulation study, we consider that the multimedia application requires an average throughput AP1 AP2 1 Mbps 2 5.5 11 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 of 380 Kbps [10]. In order to satisfy the QoS requirement of applications, we limited number of users to be associated with one AP to Nmax = 60 and give it a weight (w1) that used for class 1 (it request bandwidth of 380 Kbps) equal to 3.8 and weight (w2) that used for class 2 equal to 1.…”
Section: Partial Sharing: Psmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here the problem is to compare the various types of control using simulation. In the simulation study, we consider that the multimedia application requires an average throughput AP1 AP2 1 Mbps 2 5.5 11 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 of 380 Kbps [10]. In order to satisfy the QoS requirement of applications, we limited number of users to be associated with one AP to Nmax = 60 and give it a weight (w1) that used for class 1 (it request bandwidth of 380 Kbps) equal to 3.8 and weight (w2) that used for class 2 equal to 1.…”
Section: Partial Sharing: Psmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The work in [13] already proposed a framework for congestion control in WLANs, but, again, it relied on a centralized architecture: its aim was the support of business models where user profiles where considered in the load balancing algorithm. A further extension has been proposed in [14] for the support of QoS extension in WLANs.…”
Section: B Related Work In Load Balancing Of Wlansmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is efficient, because it can redistribute the load online and without a costly re-planning of the network: adding intelligence in the network is always cheaper than touching physical components. This justifies why recently a lot of work appeared about implementations of load balancing for wireless networks [1 1]]1 [12]1 [13].…”
Section: B Related Work In Load Balancing Of Wlansmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations