2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.comcom.2007.01.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

QoS-constrained core selection for group communication

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent research in multicast protocols includes multi-core multicast trees by k-center or r-dominating [11,12] with multiple cores nodes selection [13][14][15][16] which can enhance the solution space in terms of QoS-efficiency of solutions in interand intra-domain routing.…”
Section: Multicast Routingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent research in multicast protocols includes multi-core multicast trees by k-center or r-dominating [11,12] with multiple cores nodes selection [13][14][15][16] which can enhance the solution space in terms of QoS-efficiency of solutions in interand intra-domain routing.…”
Section: Multicast Routingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have tested the performance of our proposed heuristics against GREEDY (Salama, 1996), the most prominent algorithm for the QoS-constrained many-to-many problem in question, as well as against SPAN (Karaman & Hassanein, 2007a) and its extensions SPAN/COST and SPAN/ADJUST (Karaman & Hassanein, 2007b), which to the best of our knowledge offer the best performance in terms of cost metrics known in the literature. The test network was created with the nem network topology generator (Magoni, 2002) and Waxman model (Waxman, 1988).…”
Section: Computational Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most popular approach for this QoS-constrained many-to-many problem is GREEDY, a procedure proposed by Salama (1996), which operates in a symmetric, centralized deployment. A major improvement to GREEDY is the SPAN framework (Karaman & Hassanein, 2007a) and its extensions (Karaman & Hassanein, 2007b), which has consistently shown better perfromance than other approaches in the literature. SPAN is a generic core-based framework for asymmetric, decentralized delayconstrained multicast routing in multi-source groups that consists of core selection and tree construction modules.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Source based tree SBT or Shortest Path Tree SPT is composed of the shortest paths between the source as root and each receivers of multicast group. The main motivations behind using a source based tree SBT are the simplicity of building in a distributed manner using only the unicast routing information [13], [14], and optimization of transmission delay between source and each receiver [6]. The main drawbacks of SBT are: additional costs for maintaining SBT trees, and the number of statements to be stored in the nodes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%