2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-15-1097-7_81
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

QoS Aware Group-Based Workload Scheduling in Cloud Environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This hybrid model was found to surpass traditional GA-based methods, including Max-Min and Min-Min algorithms, in performance metrics. Mohanty and Moharana [17] developed a group-based scheduling strategy in cloud environments, focusing on the available processing power and bandwidth of resources. Their method involved clustering jobs by required Million Instructions per Second (MIPS) and aimed to satisfy client QoS requirements while optimizing resource usage.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This hybrid model was found to surpass traditional GA-based methods, including Max-Min and Min-Min algorithms, in performance metrics. Mohanty and Moharana [17] developed a group-based scheduling strategy in cloud environments, focusing on the available processing power and bandwidth of resources. Their method involved clustering jobs by required Million Instructions per Second (MIPS) and aimed to satisfy client QoS requirements while optimizing resource usage.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The obtained results found to be better than the standard GA algorithm. In Mohanty et al, 12 the authors proposed a group‐based scheduling algorithm for individual tasks according to its bandwidth (BW) and processing capability of the resource, which is available in the cloud environment. The proposed method clusters the jobs based on the required Million Instructions Per Second (MIPS) and later schedules them to computing resources.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As observed in Section 2, the allocation may be done at process-level [15], user-level [16], or group-level [21]. The faucet system that we contribute is designed so as to provide fair distribution of internal currency among users, with the assumption that the users are identified and registered for making demands.…”
Section: Abstraction For Demands: the Level At Which Distribution Is ...mentioning
confidence: 99%