2011 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC) 2011
DOI: 10.1109/icc.2011.5962458
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

QoE-Driven Sender Bitrate Adaptation Scheme for Video Applications over IP Multimedia Subsystem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Depending on the determination of the appropriate QoE IFs which may need to be adjusted for a given service, QoE optimization may be performed at different locations, as depicted in Figure 2. Thus, as summarized in Table 4, the optimization can be conducted by applying various control mechanisms at the base stations within various access networks [109][110][111] by applying policy management rules at the gateways or routers within the core network [97,103,112,113], by conducting adjustments at the servers in the service/application [104,113,114], content or cloud domains, or the combination thereof [107], as well as on end-user device [115]. Since QoE control relies on QoE monitoring and measurement information, usually the control locations are the same as monitoring and measurement points.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Depending on the determination of the appropriate QoE IFs which may need to be adjusted for a given service, QoE optimization may be performed at different locations, as depicted in Figure 2. Thus, as summarized in Table 4, the optimization can be conducted by applying various control mechanisms at the base stations within various access networks [109][110][111] by applying policy management rules at the gateways or routers within the core network [97,103,112,113], by conducting adjustments at the servers in the service/application [104,113,114], content or cloud domains, or the combination thereof [107], as well as on end-user device [115]. Since QoE control relies on QoE monitoring and measurement information, usually the control locations are the same as monitoring and measurement points.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The addressed approaches propose various QoE optimization strategies that are aimed at optimal network resource allocation [100,101,112,113]; optimal radio resource allocation [97,103,107,109]; service optimization [97,100,102,107,110,114]; optimized handover decision [113]; access network selection [111]; or battery consumption [115].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [18], subjective view tests for assessing the perceptual quality of low bit-rate video is conducted, which include five distinctive dimensions, such as encoder type, video content, bit rate, frame size (FS), and FR. The QoE-driven model presented in [19] is proposed, which encompassed the content provision and network bandwidth availability. By finding the impact of QoE mapping parameters on end-to-end perceptual video quality, the adaptive SBR scheme is investigated at pre-encoding stage, which is QoE-driven for video applications.…”
Section: Quality-of-experience Perceptive Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And in [5], a model is proposed based on dynamic sender bit rate control to subjectively estimate the quality of video streaming. In [6], the authors present a new fuzzy logic based SBR adaptation scheme at preencoding stage. The scheme adapts SBR based on feedback information of the QoE prediction model which evaluates Mean Opinion Score (MOS) according to the current congestion and degradation on the receiver.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%