2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00211-018-0991-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

QMC integration for lognormal-parametric, elliptic PDEs: local supports and product weights

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
71
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While retaining linear scaling w.r. to the spatial resolution of the approximate GRF in D, the hierarchical nature of multiresolution analyses (MRAs) naturally enables multilevel QMC (MLQMC) algorithms with a discretization level dependent resolution of GRF and QMC integration. In addition, as observed by us recently in [20,31], the localization of the supports of the representation system in D allows us to use QMC quadrature with product weights. This, in turn, is known to afford linear scaling of the work with respect to the parameter dimension s to compute the QMC generating vectors (see [14,42] and the references there).…”
mentioning
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…While retaining linear scaling w.r. to the spatial resolution of the approximate GRF in D, the hierarchical nature of multiresolution analyses (MRAs) naturally enables multilevel QMC (MLQMC) algorithms with a discretization level dependent resolution of GRF and QMC integration. In addition, as observed by us recently in [20,31], the localization of the supports of the representation system in D allows us to use QMC quadrature with product weights. This, in turn, is known to afford linear scaling of the work with respect to the parameter dimension s to compute the QMC generating vectors (see [14,42] and the references there).…”
mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The present results go in several respects beyond those in [33]. We consider, in particular, MLQMC-FE discretizations, and use sharper bounds than those in [33] on the error caused by truncating the expansion of the GRF, from our single-level analysis in [31]. We also generalize, based on [31], the QMC error analysis by admitting Gaussian type weight functions in the anisotropic QMC norms, as opposed to the exponential weights used in [26,36].…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast to our paper, they treat the truncation error in a general setting, and as for the QMC integration error, they consider both the exponential weight functions and the Gaussian weight function for the weighted Sobolev space. As for the exponential weight function, the current paper and [17] impose essentially the same assumptions (Assumption B below), and show the same convergence rate. However, our proof strategy is different, which turns out to result in different (product) weights, (and a different constant, although it does not seem to be easy to say which is bigger).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Herrmann and Schwab [17] develops a theory under the setting essentially the same as ours. In contrast to our paper, they treat the truncation error in a general setting, and as for the QMC integration error, they consider both the exponential weight functions and the Gaussian weight function for the weighted Sobolev space.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%