2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00203-022-02927-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Qipengyuania thermophila sp. nov., isolated from a Chinese hot spring

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For Q. citrea RE35F/1 T , the genomic length was calculated as 3,031,321 bp consisting of 2,971 predicted coding genes with a DNA G+C content of 64.2 mol%, whereas the genome size of strain Q. flava SW-46 T was 3,229,668 bp in which the DNA G+C contents of both strains were 63.6 mol% and 3,156 predicted coding genes. The DNA G+C contents of three type strains all fell within the range of 60.5-66.8 mol% for members of the genus Qipengyuania [16][17][18][19]. Due to the close phylogenomic relationship between strains strain ABI-127-1 and Q. flava SW-46 T and Q. citrea RE35F/1 T , the genomes of the three type strains were compared.…”
Section: Genomic Sequencing and Annotation Of Strain Abi-127-1mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For Q. citrea RE35F/1 T , the genomic length was calculated as 3,031,321 bp consisting of 2,971 predicted coding genes with a DNA G+C content of 64.2 mol%, whereas the genome size of strain Q. flava SW-46 T was 3,229,668 bp in which the DNA G+C contents of both strains were 63.6 mol% and 3,156 predicted coding genes. The DNA G+C contents of three type strains all fell within the range of 60.5-66.8 mol% for members of the genus Qipengyuania [16][17][18][19]. Due to the close phylogenomic relationship between strains strain ABI-127-1 and Q. flava SW-46 T and Q. citrea RE35F/1 T , the genomes of the three type strains were compared.…”
Section: Genomic Sequencing and Annotation Of Strain Abi-127-1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the 19 currently validated members of Erythrobacteraceae, the genus Qipengyuania was first described in 2015, with the species type Qipengyuania sediminis [16]. Currently, the genera comprises 31 valid type species (https://lpsn.dsmz.de/genus/qipengyuania, accessed on 6 June 2023) isolated from various habitats [17][18][19]. It may indicate that this genus may be widely distributed in coastal environments like the Roseobacter lineage [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%