2011
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.83.111503
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

QCD radiative corrections toχcJproduction at hadron colliders

Abstract: To clarify the outstanding problem in charmonium production that existing theories cannot explain the observed cross sections of cJ ðJ ¼ 0; 1; 2Þ and ratio R c ¼ c2 = c1 % 0:75 (in contrast to the spin counting value 5=3) at the Tevatron, we study the complete next-to-leading order radiative corrections in nonrelativistic QCD, and find next-to-leading order contributions of 3 P ½1 J are more important than leading order at high p T , and 3 P ½1 1 decreases slower than 3 P ½1 2 , implying a natural explanation … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

18
163
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(181 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
18
163
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These measurements are compared in figure 6. The ratios are expected to be similar for pp and pp collisions since χ c mesons are produced predominantly via gluongluon interactions and depend only weakly on the centre-of-mass energy and y coverage [5,28]. The results from this analysis are compatible with the CMS and CDF results.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These measurements are compared in figure 6. The ratios are expected to be similar for pp and pp collisions since χ c mesons are produced predominantly via gluongluon interactions and depend only weakly on the centre-of-mass energy and y coverage [5,28]. The results from this analysis are compatible with the CMS and CDF results.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Figure 5 (right) shows a comparison of this measurement with the next to leading order (NLO) NRQCD calculation of ref. [5] and with the LO NRQCD calculation of ref. [24].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value measured in this work, F J/ψ χc = 32 ± 9%, is consistent with the world average of 25 ± 5 % after accounting for A dependencies in the fixed target experiments [76] 4 . CEM estimate an energy and p T independent χ c feed-down of 40% [52] whereas recent NLO NRQCD calculations estimate 25-30% at p T = 10 GeV/c [85]. Therefore, are both consistent with the data.…”
Section: B Total Cross Section Of Inclusive J/ψsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…1 ) = 0.26 ± 0.07, which is almost the same with that for χ c1 [714]. With this input, the authors were able to account for the CDF data [67,708].…”
Section: Lattice Qcdsupporting
confidence: 62%