1995
DOI: 10.1016/0920-5632(95)00382-j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

QCD on coarse lattices

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
43
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
2
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…the effects of the finiteness of the lattice spacing, are present in all simulations of lattice QCD, but are especially important for heavy quark systems as we have seen in subsection 2.2. We have already discussed how O(a) improvement can be used to reduce these effects, and there are attempts to extend the improvement programme beyond O(a) 86,87 or to even construct "perfect" lattice actions that ideally are completely free of discretisation errors 88,89,90 . Once these cut-off effects are reduced, either by employing the Symanzik improvement programme or by absorbing effects of large quark masses into the normalisation of quark fields (KLM-norm), residual discretisation errors have to be extrapolated away by taking the limit a → 0.…”
Section: Discretisation Errorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the effects of the finiteness of the lattice spacing, are present in all simulations of lattice QCD, but are especially important for heavy quark systems as we have seen in subsection 2.2. We have already discussed how O(a) improvement can be used to reduce these effects, and there are attempts to extend the improvement programme beyond O(a) 86,87 or to even construct "perfect" lattice actions that ideally are completely free of discretisation errors 88,89,90 . Once these cut-off effects are reduced, either by employing the Symanzik improvement programme or by absorbing effects of large quark masses into the normalisation of quark fields (KLM-norm), residual discretisation errors have to be extrapolated away by taking the limit a → 0.…”
Section: Discretisation Errorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Refs. [38,34,32]). Using the lattice with a s = 0.36 fm here provides an increase in computational efficiency of some two orders of magnitude compared to the simulations of adjoint quarks done on lattices with "fine" spacings in Ref.…”
Section: A Lattice Parameters and Fundamental Representation Potentialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quenched static quark potential calculated with this action exhibits good rotational symmetry and scaling already at a −1 ≈ 1GeV [18], similar to those observed for tadpole-improved and fixed point actions [19,20].…”
Section: Choice Of Action and Simulation Parametersmentioning
confidence: 58%