1997
DOI: 10.1063/1.53606
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

QCD fits to ZEUS and fixed target structure function data

Abstract: Preliminary results are presented on the gluon density obtained from a QCD analysis of ZEUS and NMC F2 structure function data. Also given is an estimate of the experimental error on the positron-proton NC Born cross-section at large x and Q2.Comment: 6 pages, 3 figures. Latex source file and 3 separate .eps files. Talk presented at the DIS97 workshop, Chicago, April 14-18 199

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This Markovian MC program has been tested in refs [10]. and[11] against two non-MC programs QCDnum16[21] and APCheb33[22]. Small systematic discrepancy between EvolMC and QCDnum16 for gluon distribution reported in ref [10].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This Markovian MC program has been tested in refs [10]. and[11] against two non-MC programs QCDnum16[21] and APCheb33[22]. Small systematic discrepancy between EvolMC and QCDnum16 for gluon distribution reported in ref [10].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The success of fixed-order perturbative QCD in describing the increasingly precise HERA F 2 data when Q 2 1 GeV 2 has been confirmed many times by successful NLO fits [24]. From these a gluon distribution may be extracted, (see figure 3(a)), and predictions for F c 2 (figure 3(b)), dijet production, and F L , all of which have now been supported by direct measurements [25].…”
Section: Qcd: Resummation Of Logs Of Qmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The statistical and systematic experimental errors are added in quadrature. We use the qcdnum program [15] to perform the NLO DGLAP evolution and the minuit program [16] to find the optimal parameters. The values of α S (M 2 Z ) and the charm and bottom quark masses are taken to be the same as in the MRST2001 NLO parton set [17].…”
Section: (A)mentioning
confidence: 99%