2020
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.125.052001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

QCD Crossover at Finite Chemical Potential from Lattice Simulations

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

24
238
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 289 publications
(263 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
24
238
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For a comparison of the curvature at small baryon-chemical potential see Table I. Other theoretical results: fRG for QCD with dynamical hadronization [23] (Fu et al), lattice QCD with analytic continuation from imaginary chemical potential [57] (WB), lattice QCD with Taylor expansion at vanishing chemical potential [54] (HotQCD), DSE approach with backcoupled quarks and a dressed vertex [30] (Fischer et al), and DSE calculations with a gluon model [32] the current-quark masses; see Sec. III.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For a comparison of the curvature at small baryon-chemical potential see Table I. Other theoretical results: fRG for QCD with dynamical hadronization [23] (Fu et al), lattice QCD with analytic continuation from imaginary chemical potential [57] (WB), lattice QCD with Taylor expansion at vanishing chemical potential [54] (HotQCD), DSE approach with backcoupled quarks and a dressed vertex [30] (Fischer et al), and DSE calculations with a gluon model [32] the current-quark masses; see Sec. III.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…fRG-DSE: this work 0.0179(8) 0.0150(7) fRG: [23] 0.0176(1) 0.0142(2) Lattice: [57] Á Á Á 0.0153(18) Lattice: [52] Á Á Á 0.0144(26) Lattice: [54] Á Á Á 0.015(4) DSE: [32] Á Á Á 0.038 DSE: [9,30,89] 0.0456 0.0238 fRG: [25] 0.0051 Á Á Á Lattice: [85] 0.0078(39) Á Á Á Lattice: [86] 0.0056(6) Á Á Á the present STI-construction of the vertex. Based on this analysis and the results in [23] on nontrivial momentum dependencies for μ B =T ≳ 3 we conclude that the present approximation has to be upgraded towards solving the DSE for ΔΓ ð3Þ qqA in this regime.…”
Section: Curvature κmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The direct study of the phase diagram is not possible due to the sign problem; however, several extrapolation methods are available including the analytic continuation from imaginary chemical potential [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22], the Taylor expansion method [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34], and the reweighting method [35][36][37][38][39][40]. All of these methods are based on the fact that the sign problem is absent at μ ¼ 0 or at purely imaginary chemical potential.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to investigate the transition line in QCD, one has to circumvent the sign problem in some way. Previous studies used the reweighting method [4][5][6], the Taylor expansion from μ ¼ 0 [7][8][9][10][11][12] or analytic continuation from μ ≤ 0 [13][14][15][16]. These methods deliver solid results for quark chemical potentials up to μ q =T ≃ 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%