1981
DOI: 10.1016/0550-3213(81)90192-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

QCD corrections to P wave quarkonium decays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
80
2

Year Published

1984
1984
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
80
2
Order By: Relevance
“…where we have added the one-loop correction to the contribution at leading order of v [6]. If we take m c = 1.5GeV and α s (m c ) ≈ 0.3, we obtain by using experimental values of hadron masses:…”
Section: Numerical Impact Of the Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where we have added the one-loop correction to the contribution at leading order of v [6]. If we take m c = 1.5GeV and α s (m c ) ≈ 0.3, we obtain by using experimental values of hadron masses:…”
Section: Numerical Impact Of the Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the theoretical side, because charm quark can be taken as heavy quark and it moves with a small velocity v inside a charmonium in its rest-frame, one may describe the c-orc quark inside charmonia with a nonrelativistic wave-functions by taking charmonia as a bound-state of a cc pair. In most previous calculations for decays of charmonium such a nonrelativistic wave-functions is employed for χ c0,2 → γγ [6,7,8,9,10]. By expanding the small velocity v, the decay width at the leading order of v can be expressed with the derivatives of the wave functions at origin, where the leading order is at v 2 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Infrared sensitive logarithms ∼ ln(m/ǫ) appear in the calculation of P -wave decays, to be precise in the NLO corrections to 3 P 0,2 decays [20] and already in the leading-order expressions of 1 P 1 and 3 P 1 decays [19]. That is, without keeping the binding energy non-zero, the perturbative part of the calculation would diverge.…”
Section: Comparison With Previous Approaches and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the wave-function approach, the leading-order (in α s (m)) decay is into two gluons for the J = 0, 2 states, Γ( 3 P 0,2 → gg) = O(α 2 s ), while the J = 1 state can first decay at O(α 3 s ) into either three gluons or a quark-antiquark-pair plus a gluon. Moreover, it was found [19,20,21] that the quark-antiquark-gluon cuts are singular in the limit of zero binding energy ǫ…”
Section: Some Phenomenologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For χ b (0 ++ ) we used the QCD lattice result [21] for the leading order Γ(χ → gg) width of 354 keV. To be more precise, we included the standard NLO correction (1 + 9.8α S /π) for χ b (0 ++ ), see, for example, [22]. We assume that the amplitude for χ production behaves as M ∝ e b(t 1 +t 2 )/2 (16) with slope b = 4 GeV −2 , where t i are the momentum transfer squared at the proton (antiproton) vertices.…”
Section: Double-diffractive χ Meson Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%