1981
DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(81)90931-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Q waves and transmural infarcts: The terms are not the same

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1985
1985
1997
1997

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different scoring systems for quantifying the extent of MI from the ECG have been developed. The Selvester QRS scoring system has proved its validity in the diagnosis, size esti mation and outcome prediction of MI [4][5][6][7], The scoring system has also been proven to predict LVEF immediate ly following an acute MI in the absence of thrombolytic KARC.FR therapy [8] where any depression in LVEF must be due to necrosis. A decreased pre-CABG LVEF has been shown by Hinohora ct al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different scoring systems for quantifying the extent of MI from the ECG have been developed. The Selvester QRS scoring system has proved its validity in the diagnosis, size esti mation and outcome prediction of MI [4][5][6][7], The scoring system has also been proven to predict LVEF immediate ly following an acute MI in the absence of thrombolytic KARC.FR therapy [8] where any depression in LVEF must be due to necrosis. A decreased pre-CABG LVEF has been shown by Hinohora ct al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%