2005
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti315
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Q-SiteFinder: an energy-based method for the prediction of protein-ligand binding sites

Abstract: Both Q-SiteFinder and Pocket-Finder have been made available online at http://www.bioinformatics.leeds.ac.uk/qsitefinder and http://www.bioinformatics.leeds.ac.uk/pocketfinder

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
736
0
9

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 915 publications
(753 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
8
736
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…The degree of conservation is subdivided into nine grades, with grade 1 being the least and grade 9 being most conserved. Ligand binding sites (LBS) were identified with the Q-SiteFinder (Laurie & Jackson, 2005) (http://www.modelling.leeds.ac.uk/qsitefinder/) that evaluates the interaction energy between a CH 3 van der Waals probe and the protein (Laurie & Jackson, 2005). The resulting binding sites were formed from clusters of probes and ranked according to the sum of total binding energies for each cluster.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The degree of conservation is subdivided into nine grades, with grade 1 being the least and grade 9 being most conserved. Ligand binding sites (LBS) were identified with the Q-SiteFinder (Laurie & Jackson, 2005) (http://www.modelling.leeds.ac.uk/qsitefinder/) that evaluates the interaction energy between a CH 3 van der Waals probe and the protein (Laurie & Jackson, 2005). The resulting binding sites were formed from clusters of probes and ranked according to the sum of total binding energies for each cluster.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the ten best LBS reported by Q-SiteFinder (Laurie & Jackson, 2005), five were chosen on the basis of the number of conserved residues around the LBS ( Table 2). Note that the sites are not numbered sequentially, but the numbers represent the original ranking reported by QSiteFinder, whereby the highest ranking binding site is denoted as site 1.…”
Section: Predicted Lbsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Table I, a short summary is given on some PS methods used in this study. These methods are citation-classics (Q-SiteFinder 24 and Pass 26 ), and a novel, promising program Sitehound 23 is also included. The PS algorithms use either geometrical or simplified, chemical grid-based search routines, and represent the putative binding pockets as a cluster of probe spheres.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The active site residues of the UBE2D4 protein are identified using CASTp [45], Q-site Finder [46] and SiteMap [47] tools. The protein-protein docking of the UBE2D4 with its natural substrate ubiquitin ligase CHIP is carried out using PatchDock server [48] to identify the binding site region and residues in the UBE2D4 protein.…”
Section: Active Site Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%