2022
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.2c00073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Q-Next: A Fast, Parallel, and Diagonalization-Free Alternative to Direct Inversion of the Iterative Subspace

Abstract: As computer systems dedicated to scientific calculations become massively parallel, the poor parallel performance of the Fock matrix diagonalization becomes a major impediment to achieving larger molecular sizes in self-consistent field (SCF) calculations. In this Article, a novel, highly parallel, and diagonalization-free algorithm for the accelerated convergence of the SCF procedure is presented. The algorithm, called Q-Next, draws on the second-order SCF, quadratically convergent SCF, and direct inversion o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although some approaches evaluate the exponential approximately and return to the target manifold by additional orthogonalization, 9,19 accurate evaluation is important to be able to maintain the fidelity of the relationship between parameters and the objective function values in the context of extrapolation methods like BFGS. Evaluation of the matrix exponential could be improved further, e.g., by leveraging the block-sparse antihermitian structure of r. 34 It is important to express both the gradients and parameter updates for each iteration in the same coordinate frame (basis). In the context of the DIIS methods this is usually done by working in the AO basis (e.g., as noted by Pulay in ref.…”
Section: Overview Of Scf Solver Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although some approaches evaluate the exponential approximately and return to the target manifold by additional orthogonalization, 9,19 accurate evaluation is important to be able to maintain the fidelity of the relationship between parameters and the objective function values in the context of extrapolation methods like BFGS. Evaluation of the matrix exponential could be improved further, e.g., by leveraging the block-sparse antihermitian structure of r. 34 It is important to express both the gradients and parameter updates for each iteration in the same coordinate frame (basis). In the context of the DIIS methods this is usually done by working in the AO basis (e.g., as noted by Pulay in ref.…”
Section: Overview Of Scf Solver Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Level-shift s of the L-BFGS Hessian is updated iteratively until eqn (34) is satisfied to the desired precision controlled by parameters T 1,2 (see Table 2 and Algorithm 2). The TR solver in QUOTR is based on the solver described by Burdakov et al 56 that leverages the low-rank structure of the L-BFGS Hessian.…”
Section: Pccp Papermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where H ̂is the Hamiltonian operator. For the purpose of facilitating the orbital optimization, the energy is expressed as a Taylor expansion 27 (here explicitly expressed up to second order)…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically, computing QM forces takes more than 95% of the total QM/MM time. In the recent past, various efforts have been undertaken to develop computationally affordable novel QM methods or reimplement traditional QM methods to harness the power of massively parallel central processing unit (CPU) and graphics processing unit (GPU) hardware platforms. Most notably, a number of leading quantum chemistry software packages have been empowered with GPU acceleration allowing users to achieve unprecedented simulation speeds and model larger molecular systems efficiently. For instance, our own GPU-accelerated QUICK ab initio quantum chemistry and density functional theory package is highly efficient on NVIDIA hardware. , QM/MM simulations with QUICK/AMBER have displayed respectable speedups of up to 53 times for a single GPU with respect to a CPU core for a moderate-sized QM region size that was benchmarked at the time .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%