2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.04.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Q methodology: An underutilised tool in pharmacy practice research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, one of the papers utilizes the Q methodology which constitutes of a research tool suitable for exploring the participants' subjective viewpoints. Q methodology combines quantitative and qualitative approaches, with the quantitative part lying in the statistical analysis of the collected data while the qualitative part refers to the interpretation of the results (Haua et al 2021). Three papers use a survey instrument to collect both quantitative and qualitative data, while the third paper combines Delphi survey methodology with Analytical Hierarchy Process.…”
Section: Research Methods Usedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, one of the papers utilizes the Q methodology which constitutes of a research tool suitable for exploring the participants' subjective viewpoints. Q methodology combines quantitative and qualitative approaches, with the quantitative part lying in the statistical analysis of the collected data while the qualitative part refers to the interpretation of the results (Haua et al 2021). Three papers use a survey instrument to collect both quantitative and qualitative data, while the third paper combines Delphi survey methodology with Analytical Hierarchy Process.…”
Section: Research Methods Usedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, the Q-sort of these factors was identified and marked in order to reveal differences between factors. Mark [ 57 ] refers to the selection of the Q-sort for inclusion in the final factor. In addition, a statement score is calculated for each factor.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%