2003
DOI: 10.1109/jlt.2003.808619
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Q-factor estimation and impact of spontaneous-spontaneous beat noise on the performance of optically preamplified systems with arbitrary optical filtering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As with digital SHD, if the LO laser is sufficiently well tuned, then digital domain filtering may be used to improve the transmission characteristics. In [24], a 0.5-dB improvement in the Q-factor was observed and a tolerance of up to 6 GHz to LO/signal detuning with the path length tolerance dependent on the bandwidth of the electrical filter. This technique was used for a long distance transmission of 10 × 128 Gb/s 16 QAM signals with 25 GHz spacing [56] over a distance of 1.815 km using 100 kHz linewidth lasers with phase noise cancellation, allowing a 1,650 km transmission for a 1-MHz linewidth DFB laser, an increase of 165 km from a SCR receiver, with frequency offset correction only.…”
Section: Transmissionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As with digital SHD, if the LO laser is sufficiently well tuned, then digital domain filtering may be used to improve the transmission characteristics. In [24], a 0.5-dB improvement in the Q-factor was observed and a tolerance of up to 6 GHz to LO/signal detuning with the path length tolerance dependent on the bandwidth of the electrical filter. This technique was used for a long distance transmission of 10 × 128 Gb/s 16 QAM signals with 25 GHz spacing [56] over a distance of 1.815 km using 100 kHz linewidth lasers with phase noise cancellation, allowing a 1,650 km transmission for a 1-MHz linewidth DFB laser, an increase of 165 km from a SCR receiver, with frequency offset correction only.…”
Section: Transmissionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…25 should appear after ref. 24 Equations (8) and (10) have been experimentally verified in [21,22], for PDM-SHD and SDM-SHD systems, respectively. However, it can be shown that the validity of this model is preserved for more general systems.…”
Section: Penalty Compared To Intradyne Detectionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, in a system that is optically amplified (as is the case with the CDS), amplified spontaneous emission (ASE) can beat with the LO and SBS signals and with itself. The noise variances are [44][45][46] …”
Section: Coherent Detection Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore the Q-factor technique requires only measurements of the first two statistical moments of the marks and spaces levels. In many cases, the Q-factor method gives reasonable estimation of the real BER (Bergano et al 1993;Rebola and Cartaxo 2003), but it does so 'accidentally', in the sense that the optimum decision threshold predicted by this method is far away from the true optimum (Marcuse 1990). It has been shown that in most cases Q-factor gives conservative BER estimations (Marcuse 1990;Ribeiro et al 1995).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%