2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.exmath.2022.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pythagoras numbers of orders in biquadratic fields

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This leads to the Pythagoras number, a constant well‐studied also in other settings (see, for example, [23]). Yet, in the case of the ring of integers of a totally real number field, all that is known in general is that the Pythagoras number is finite [28] and bounded by the degree of the field [16], but can grow arbitrarily large [28] (in the non‐totally real case, the Pythagoras number 5$\leqslant 5$ [27]; for some small degree cases see [22, 26, 31]). Furthermore, Siegel [29] proved that for each number field F$F$ there exists mdouble-struckN$m\in \mathbb {N}$ such that all totally positive integers divisible by m$m$ can be represented as the sum of squares.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This leads to the Pythagoras number, a constant well‐studied also in other settings (see, for example, [23]). Yet, in the case of the ring of integers of a totally real number field, all that is known in general is that the Pythagoras number is finite [28] and bounded by the degree of the field [16], but can grow arbitrarily large [28] (in the non‐totally real case, the Pythagoras number 5$\leqslant 5$ [27]; for some small degree cases see [22, 26, 31]). Furthermore, Siegel [29] proved that for each number field F$F$ there exists mdouble-struckN$m\in \mathbb {N}$ such that all totally positive integers divisible by m$m$ can be represented as the sum of squares.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%