1983
DOI: 10.1016/0012-821x(83)90071-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pyroxene-carbonate reactions in the upper mantle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
66
0
1

Year Published

1990
1990
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 207 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
66
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These fluids may then metasomatically enrich the shallower levels of the mantle «70 km) by amphibolitization, producing an appropriate source for alkaline magmatism. Figure 12.6 shows the Olafsson & Eggler solidus in relation to the positions of the major carbonation reactions of Brey et al (1983). Magnesite is the stable carbonate phase present at depths greater than about 140 km, whereas dolomite is stable Figure 12.6 The peridotite solidus in the presence of small amounts of H20 and CO2 (Olafsson & Eggler 1983) in relation to tlie major mantle carbonation reactions (Brey et al 1983).…”
Section: Simplified Petrogenetic Modelmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These fluids may then metasomatically enrich the shallower levels of the mantle «70 km) by amphibolitization, producing an appropriate source for alkaline magmatism. Figure 12.6 shows the Olafsson & Eggler solidus in relation to the positions of the major carbonation reactions of Brey et al (1983). Magnesite is the stable carbonate phase present at depths greater than about 140 km, whereas dolomite is stable Figure 12.6 The peridotite solidus in the presence of small amounts of H20 and CO2 (Olafsson & Eggler 1983) in relation to tlie major mantle carbonation reactions (Brey et al 1983).…”
Section: Simplified Petrogenetic Modelmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Unfortunately, there is some conflict concerning phase relationships in the system peridotite-HzO-COz (Brey et al 1983, Olafsson & Eggler 1983, Wyllie 1987) and the compositions of the partial melts have been inadequately characterized. However, there is a general consensus that partial melts of phologopite peridotite will be K20-and MgO-rich, while those of carbonated peridotite will be carbonate-rich.…”
Section: Simplified Petrogenetic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eggler (1989) points out that near-solidus melts formed from phlogopite-carbonate peridotite are predicted from work on simple systems to be carbonatitic. Thus the work of Brey et al (1983) and Olafsson and Eggler (1983) show that with increasing pressure phlogopite-carbonate peridotite produces liquids of more magnesian compositions and that the carbonate mineralogy changes at about 32 kbar from dolomite to magnesite. Partial melting of a phlogopite-carbonate peridotite at pressures > 32 kbar is, therefore, capable of producing a carbonatitic melt from which magnesite would crystallize as a primary phase.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The result of this metasomatism is the oxidation of local zones in the mid-to lowermost lithosphere beneath the LDG kimberlite field to levels conducive to the stabilization of carbonate. The expected stable carbonate phase is Mg-rich in any four-phase peridotite assemblage, i.e., dolomite (e.g., Wyllie and Huang 1975;Dalton and Presnall 1998a) or magnesite at higher pressure (Brey et al 1983), and the melt produced from such carbonated peridotites is always dolomitic in composition (e.g., Irving and Wyllie 1975;Brey et al 2008). However, LDG kimberlites, and kimberlites globally, are mostly dominated by calcite (e.g., Skinner and Clement 1979;Armstrong et al 2004), as are the early kimberlite melts trapped as polymineralic inclusions in LDG megacrysts.…”
Section: General Role Of Decarbonation Reactions In Producing Calcitementioning
confidence: 99%