2013
DOI: 10.1111/1574-6941.12132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pyrosequencing of environmental soil samples reveals biodiversity of thePhytophthoraresident community in chestnut forests

Abstract: Pyrosequencing analysis was performed on soils from Italian chestnut groves to evaluate the diversity of the resident Phytophthora community. Sequences analysed with a custom database discriminated 15 pathogenic Phytophthoras including species common to chestnut soils, while a total of nine species were detected with baiting. The two sites studied differed in Phytophthora diversity and the presence of specific taxa responded to specific ecological traits of the sites. Furthermore, some species not previously r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
53
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(76 reference statements)
3
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such results have proven challenging to obtain in studies targeting a broader array of microbes (Lemos et al 2011). In all comparative studies to date, number of species detected by high throughput sequencing (HTS) far exceeds those recovered using traditional isolation techniques (Vettraino et al 2012, Vannini et al 2013, Català et al 2015. In our current study, samples were collected from asymptomatic natural vegetation, and Phytophthora was detected from 64% of the sites sampled.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Such results have proven challenging to obtain in studies targeting a broader array of microbes (Lemos et al 2011). In all comparative studies to date, number of species detected by high throughput sequencing (HTS) far exceeds those recovered using traditional isolation techniques (Vettraino et al 2012, Vannini et al 2013, Català et al 2015. In our current study, samples were collected from asymptomatic natural vegetation, and Phytophthora was detected from 64% of the sites sampled.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Previous studies have used oomycete-specific primers ITS6 and ITS7 to amplify the ITS1 region with highly variable success. For example, Vannini et al (2013) recovered only 23 oomycete OTUs from 10 forest soil samples, where oomycetes contributed to 79% of all reads. More recently, Coince et al (2013) recovered a total of 10 oomycete OTUs from 20 samples of forest soil that contributed to 15% of all reads.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of next-generation sequencing approaches to study community composition and diversity of soil-borne pathogens is becoming increasingly common, although very few studies so far have focused on oomycetes (e.g. Vannini et al, 2013). A promising recent advance has been the development of Phytophthora-specific primer sets (Scibetta et al, 2012).…”
Section: How Are Soil-borne Pathogens Spatially Distributed?mentioning
confidence: 99%