The use of waste
oils as pyrolysis feedstocks to manufacture high-grade
biofuels has prompted researchers to focus on developing renewable
energy to overcome the depletion of fossil fuel supplies and the global
warming phenomena. Because of their high hydrogen and volatile matter
concentration, waste oils are ideal raw materials for the production
of biofuels. It is challenging to attain satisfactory results with
conventional methods, such as transesterification, gasification, solvent
extraction, and hydrotreating due to flaws such as high energy demand,
long time, and high operating costs. Catalytic pyrolysis of waste
edible oils was employed as a resource for the generation of biodiesel.
The application of the catalytic cracking process has the potential
to alleviate the existing situation. In this study of catalytic cracking
conversion of waste cooking oil to produce different biofuels, grades
were investigated using two heterogeneous catalysts. The catalysts
were activated montmorillonite (PAMMT) clay and its modified form
using a chitosan biopolymer (PAMMT-CH) nanocomposite. The catalysts
were identified using infrared spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction patterns,
transmittance electron microscopy images, surface area, and thermal
stability. The catalysts were tested for their performances using
different amounts (0.1–1% by weight) at a temperature assortment
of 200–400 °C during a time range of 60–300 min.
The experimental studies were carried out in a batch reactor. GC mass
spectra were used to investigate the catalytic cracking products.
Fractional distillation is used to separate the final products from
various reaction conditions. The physicochemical properties of resulting
biofuels were profiled by quantifying their densities, viscosities,
specific gravities, pour points, flash and fire points, cetane numbers,
carbon and ash residues, and sulfur contents. The optimum conditions
of the yield product were 300 and 400 °C, catalyst weights of
0.7 and 0.8% w/v, and reaction times of 120 and 180 min concerning
the (PAMMT) and (PAMMT-CH) nanocomposite, respectively. The determined
properties were located within the limits of the specific standards
of ASTM specifications. As a result, the PAMMT nanocomposite produced
biofuel comparable to biodiesel according to ASTM specifications,
while the PAMMT-CH nanocomposite produced biofuel comparable to biojet.