Pyrolysis and Hydropyrolysis of Peat at High Heating Rates

Eklund, Hans; Wanzl, W.

doi:10.1007/978-94-009-4932-4_17

Cited by 5 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The most direct evidence for hydrogenation during primary coal devolatilization is that the yields of both tar and gas are enhanced under elevated H 2 pressures, where the enhancements are much greater under slow heating conditions than during rapid coal devolatilization. 5 This heating rate dependence could conceivably connect to the extensive rearrangements associated with the catalytic hydrotreatment of petroleum resids, which comprise the conversion of condensed aromatics into naphthene rings with subsequent scission into GHCs, especially longer aliphatics and olefins. Only very slow heating provides sufficient reaction time for such complex chemistry.…”

Section: ■ Mathematical Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

FLASHCHAIN Theory for Rapid Coal Devolatilization Kinetics. 10. Extents of Conversion for Hydropyrolysis and Hydrogasification of Any Coal

Niksa¹

2018

Energy Fuels

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper extends FLASHCHAIN theory with mechanisms for (i) hydrogenation of labile bridges in the condensed coal phase which enhance tar yields during primary devolatilization under some, but not all, conditions and (ii) heterogeneous hydrogasification of char into CH 4 . Under the H 2 pressures associated with entrained coal gasification technology, coal devolatilization at heating rates faster than 10 3 °C/s does not provide sufficient time for appreciable bridge hydrogenation so tar yields are not enhanced. Conversely, tar yields under slow heating conditions are strongly enhanced. The mechanisms proposed for bridge hydrogenation and its associated impact on fragment recombination in FLASHCHAIN accurately depict the joint impact of heating rate and H 2 pressure on tar yields. Whereas tar yields from rapid devolatilization diminish for progressively higher pressures, total weight loss remains steady or passes through a minimum at some H 2 pressure around 1 MPa, because char hydrogasification counteracts the lower weight loss associated with diminished tar yields at progressively higher pressures. A single, half-order methanation reaction within the CBK/G framework gave results within the measurement uncertainties through 15 MPa H 2 . In combination, the mechanisms for hydropyrolysis and hydrogasification accurately interpreted a database representing coals of rank from lignite to medium volatile bituminous; heating rates from 1 to 10 3 °C/s; temperatures from 550 to 1150 °C; reaction times to 180 s; and particle diameters to 1 mm. The assigned hydrogasification reactivities are far less variable than those for char gasification by steam and CO 2 , and show no consistent trend with rank.

show abstract

Section: ■ Mathematical Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%