1973
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(73)93211-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pyrazinamide and Other Drugs in Tuberculous Meningitis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
12
1

Year Published

1977
1977
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
5
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is consistent with CSF analysis in humans in which the PZA concentration in the CSF exceeded that in the serum 29. For example, in the brain the C 60min was 0.00463 %ID/cc while in the plasma the C 60min was 0.00272 %ID/cc.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…This result is consistent with CSF analysis in humans in which the PZA concentration in the CSF exceeded that in the serum 29. For example, in the brain the C 60min was 0.00463 %ID/cc while in the plasma the C 60min was 0.00272 %ID/cc.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The excellent penetration of pyrazinamide into the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) was first demonstrated in a single case report of a patient with tuberculous meningitis. 3 This finding was confirmed in recent studies in a larger number of patients with tuberculous meningitis.' A number of antituberculosis drugs, notably ethambutol, rifampicin and streptomycin, pass into the CSF in sufficient concentrations during the active stage of tuberculous meningitis but, after treatment, as the blood-brain barrier is restored, the concentrations of these drugs in the CSF decrease.7 Data on the penetration of pyrazinamide into the CSF during the course of treatment of the meningitis are limited.…”
supporting
confidence: 62%
“…Experiments demonstrating that RMP was more effective than other antimicrobial agents in killing Staphylococcus aureus within polymorphonuclear leukocytes have been explained by assuming that RMP penetrates the cell more effectively (38). This explanation cannot account for differences between INH and RMP in vivo, because INH has been shown to be highly effective against intracellular tubercle bacilli (3) and penetrates the blood-brain (39) and other membrane barriers with ease (40). Inactivity of SM on organisms in cells (3,41) may, however, account for its failure as a sterilizing drug.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%