2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2019.00871
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pyramidal Person Re-IDentification via Multi-Loss Dynamic Training

Abstract: Most existing Re-IDentification (Re-ID) methods are highly dependent on precise bounding boxes that enable images to be aligned with each other. However, due to the challenging practical scenarios, current detection models often produce inaccurate bounding boxes, which inevitably degenerate the performance of existing Re-ID algorithms. In this paper, we propose a novel coarse-to-fine pyramid model to relax the need of bounding boxes, which not only incorporates local and global information, but also integrates… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
205
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 327 publications
(206 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(72 reference statements)
0
205
1
Order By: Relevance
“…All methods have been divided into different types. Pyramid [22] achieves surprising performance on two datasets. However, it concatenates 21 local features of different scale.…”
Section: Comparison Of State-of-the-artsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All methods have been divided into different types. Pyramid [22] achieves surprising performance on two datasets. However, it concatenates 21 local features of different scale.…”
Section: Comparison Of State-of-the-artsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though the current top approach achieves 88.2% mAP on the Market dataset, we still outperform many recent methods by a large margin. Current top performing methods typically use a complex architecture [39,38,46] or tricks such as larger input images and more elaborate augmentations [20]. Our single-task baseline is essentially a simplified TriNet architecture [8], nevertheless, it still significantly improves the original mAP score of 69.14% by over 8%, yielding a solid baseline performance for person ReID.…”
Section: Quantitative Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) Market1501: In Table VI, we report the comparison results with 13 non-post-processing methods and 3 postprocessing methods. Compared with the non-post-processing methods, the proposed method surpasses all methods on mAP, and gets the second best result at Rank-1 and performs slightly worse than the Pyramid [44] by 0.1% at Rank-1. However, the proposed method is very likely to have a better performance with a better baseline.…”
Section: Comparison With State-of-the-artmentioning
confidence: 91%