2001
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.63.047301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pygmy dipole resonances in the relativistic random phase approximation

Abstract: The isovector dipole response in 208 Pb is described in the framework of a fully self-consistent relativistic random phase approximation. The NL3 parameter set for the effective mean-field Lagrangian with nonlinear meson self-interaction terms, used in the present calculations, reproduces ground state properties as well as the excitation energies of giant resonances in nuclei. In addition to the isovector dipole resonance in 208 Pb, the present analysis predicts the occurrence of low-lying E1 peaks in the ene… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
65
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
12
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead, each of them is fragmented and broadened due to Landau damping (occurring already on the R(Q)RPA level), damping to complex configurations (essentially taken into account in R(Q)TBA) and particle escape to continuum [54]. However, theoretical methods have a very convenient tool for an approximate separation of these two excitation modes, namely the proton and neutron transitions densities, which reveal a specific pattern characterizing neutron skin oscillation [82]: inphase oscillation of proton and neutron transition densities inside the nucleus with a visible dominance (correlated with the neutron excess) of the neutron component in the surface area. In contrast, GDR shows out of phase proton and neutron density oscillations.…”
Section: Calculation Details Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, each of them is fragmented and broadened due to Landau damping (occurring already on the R(Q)RPA level), damping to complex configurations (essentially taken into account in R(Q)TBA) and particle escape to continuum [54]. However, theoretical methods have a very convenient tool for an approximate separation of these two excitation modes, namely the proton and neutron transitions densities, which reveal a specific pattern characterizing neutron skin oscillation [82]: inphase oscillation of proton and neutron transition densities inside the nucleus with a visible dominance (correlated with the neutron excess) of the neutron component in the surface area. In contrast, GDR shows out of phase proton and neutron density oscillations.…”
Section: Calculation Details Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another, more general problem is the experimental separation of the PDR from the GDR. While theoretical transition densities provide a signature in the model calculations [20], the experimentally determined reduced B(E1) strengths do not allow such a distinction. A possible experimental approach to the distinction of PDR and GDR is the use of isoscalar probes, and a pioneering (α, α ′ γ) experiment has been performed [21] demonstrating a large exhaustion of the isoscalar energy-weighted sum rule by lowenergy E1 transitions in 208 Pb.…”
Section: The Heaviest Stable Doubly Magic Nucleusmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In the models the properties of the PDR are very sensitive to the mean-field description and predicted strength might thus be partially shifted to higher excitation energies. One should rather analyze the theoretical transition densities [20,39] to select those with a dominant PDR character.…”
Section: Excitation Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2) at subnuclear densities of the order of 10 13 g/cm 3 , the pasta resembles a collection of spherical neutron-rich nuclei embedded in a dilute neutron gas. Neutron-rich nuclei with large neutron skins have Pygmy giant resonances, involving collective oscillations of the neutron skin against the symmetric core [22,23]. We expect that the soft neutronrich pasta will have many low-energy collective oscillations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%