2010
DOI: 10.1136/gut.2009.208967g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PWE-037 The clinical outcome of flares of inflammatory bowel disease in patients with concomitantClostridium difficileinfection

Abstract: IntroductionSeveral studies have highlighted the risks in patients with a flare of colitis and concomitant Clostridium difficile infection: including increased mortality and increased rates of colectomy in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). Infection control policies, including antibiotic prescribing, have had an impact on rates of Clostridium difficile associated diarrhoea (CDAD) in the general in-patient population but rates of CDAD in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have been reported to be as high as … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A few studies have demonstrated an increase risk of colectomy with CDI in IBD patients, while others have either shown an inverse relationship or no effect at all . A recent meta‐analysis concluded that CDI was associated with higher surgical rates in ulcerative colitis (UC); however, multiple key studies were not analysed, including several recently published studies . Moreover, substantial variability in follow‐up period between studies limited the comparability of studies contained in this review.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few studies have demonstrated an increase risk of colectomy with CDI in IBD patients, while others have either shown an inverse relationship or no effect at all . A recent meta‐analysis concluded that CDI was associated with higher surgical rates in ulcerative colitis (UC); however, multiple key studies were not analysed, including several recently published studies . Moreover, substantial variability in follow‐up period between studies limited the comparability of studies contained in this review.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%