PW 1921 Ensuring children are being taught the skills for drowning prevention

Abstract

BackgroundReducing child (0–14 years) drowning is a priority of the Australian Water Safety Strategy. Research suggests at least 40% of children cannot achieve national benchmarks of swimming 50 m freestyle; 25 m survival backstroke and treading/sculling water for two minutes by 12 years. School swimming programs vary across Australia; therefore many parents enrol their children in private lessons from a young age.ObjectiveTo provide a situational analysis of what children are learning in private swimming lessons and examine their achievement of swimming and survival skills.MethodsA cross-sectional study of children aged between 3–15 years attending private swimming lessons in Australia between July-2014 and June-2017. Achievement of key swimming and survival skills were analysed by age and assessed against the national benchmark.Findings62 353 children were included, 51% male, 53% aged 5–7 years, and 57% were from high socio-economic areas. Children are predominantly being taught freestyle (87%) and backstroke skills (84%). Children were more likely to learn breaststroke (52%) and butterfly (14%) over survival backstroke (46%) and rescue techniques (9%). Overall, 34% could swim 50 m freestyle, 52% could swim 25 m survival backstroke and 32% could tread/scull water for two minutes. The average age for achieving 50 m freestyle was at 9.2 years.DiscussionOnly one third of children are meeting national targets. A stronger emphasis on teaching survival and lifesaving skills would strengthen prevention efforts, preparing young people to make informed decisions when participating in aquatic activities in the future.ConclusionThis research provides valuable insights on children’s swimming and survival skills. Swim schools must place more value on survival skills that can be applied in realistic situations.Policy implicationsFindings provide current evidence for advocacy and influencing policy towards compulsory swimming and survival lessons. Findings informed the National Swimming and Water Safety Education Framework review (abstract 1927).AcknowledgementThis research is supported by Royal Life Saving Society – Australia. The drowning prevention research of Royal Life Saving Society – Australia is supported by the Australian Government.

Reducing inequities among adult female migrants at higher risk for drowning in Australia: The value of swimming and water safety programs

“…11 Pidgeon and colleagues suggest some migrants to Australia may be at higher risk of drowning based on their time in Australia, country of birth and poor SWS skills. 10 These findings are consistent with other research, suggesting that culturally diverse populations are at higher risk of drowning due to lack of SWS skills, poor risk perception of drowning and overall lower rates of participation in water-based activities. 12,13 These factors present a challenge for drowning prevention practitioners in how to overcome the complexity of drowning prevention for different population groups, from cross-cultural communication, education and participation perspectives.…”

“…Participant feedback indicated that the programs were too short to learn to swim adequately, despite participants stating they had overcome their fear of water and were now confident to be in the Males are overrepresented in drowning statistics worldwide [1][2][3]10 ; therefore, engaging men in SWS programs is equally important as providing programs for women, in order to reduce drowning. Two participants spoke about their husband's support in learning to swim and willingness to pay for further lessons and, in the future, participating together as a family.…”

“…3 In Australia 26% of drowning deaths are of people born overseas (including residents, overseas tourists and international students), with the top five countries of birth being China, New Zealand, England, South Korea and India. 10 When comparing to population statistics during the same time period (2005)(2006)(2007)(2008)(2009)(2010)(2011)(2012)(2013)(2014)(2015), 26% of the Australian population were born overseas; the most common countries of birth were England, China, India and New Zealand. 11 Pidgeon and colleagues suggest some migrants to Australia may be at higher risk of drowning based on their time in Australia, country of birth and poor SWS skills.…”